BCVVF
Price
$8.15
Change
+$0.07 (+0.87%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.8B
BDIMF
Price
$7.07
Change
-$0.02 (-0.28%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
281.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCVVF vs BDIMF

Header iconBCVVF vs BDIMF Comparison
Open Charts BCVVF vs BDIMFBanner chart's image
BOC Aviation
Price$8.15
Change+$0.07 (+0.87%)
Volume$24.5K
Capitalization5.8B
Black Diamond Group
Price$7.07
Change-$0.02 (-0.28%)
Volume$300
Capitalization281.73M
BCVVF vs BDIMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BDIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCVVF vs. BDIMF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCVVF is a Hold and BDIMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BCVVF: $8.15 vs. BDIMF: $7.07)
Brand notoriety: BCVVF and BDIMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCVVF: 545% vs. BDIMF: 22%
Market capitalization -- BCVVF: $5.8B vs. BDIMF: $281.73M
BCVVF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $5.8B. BDIMF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $281.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCVVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBDIMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCVVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BDIMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BDIMF is a better buy in the long-term than BCVVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCVVF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BDIMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCVVF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BDIMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BDIMF is a better buy in the short-term than BCVVF.

Price Growth

BCVVF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BDIMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCVVF($5.8B) has a higher market cap than BDIMF($282M). BCVVF has higher P/E ratio than BDIMF: BCVVF (270.27) vs BDIMF (14.22). BDIMF (8.084) and BCVVF (8.067) have similar YTD gains . BCVVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.54B vs. BDIMF (85.7M). BCVVF has more cash in the bank: 85.2M vs. BDIMF (6.53M). BDIMF has less debt than BCVVF: BDIMF (238M) vs BCVVF (15.1B). BCVVF has higher revenues than BDIMF: BCVVF (2.14B) vs BDIMF (336M).
BCVVFBDIMFBCVVF / BDIMF
Capitalization5.8B282M2,058%
EBITDA1.54B85.7M1,793%
Gain YTD8.0678.084100%
P/E Ratio270.2714.221,900%
Revenue2.14B336M638%
Total Cash85.2M6.53M1,304%
Total Debt15.1B238M6,345%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCVVF vs BDIMF: Fundamental Ratings
BCVVF
BDIMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
548
SMR RATING
1..100
5269
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6931
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCVVF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as BDIMF (49). This means that BCVVF’s stock grew similarly to BDIMF’s over the last 12 months.

BDIMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCVVF (54). This means that BDIMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCVVF’s over the last 12 months.

BCVVF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BDIMF (69). This means that BCVVF’s stock grew similarly to BDIMF’s over the last 12 months.

BCVVF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BDIMF (47). This means that BCVVF’s stock grew similarly to BDIMF’s over the last 12 months.

BDIMF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCVVF (69). This means that BDIMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCVVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCVVFBDIMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BDIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCMT32.160.27
+0.85%
Direxion HCM Tactical EnhU.S.EqStratETF
WTPI32.060.17
+0.53%
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
KNG48.920.17
+0.35%
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500® Dv Ast Tgt Inc ETF
BNOV41.080.14
+0.34%
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF Nov
CRAK32.36N/A
N/A
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF

BCVVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCVVF and BDIMF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCVVF and BDIMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCVVF
1D Price
Change %
BCVVF100%
N/A
BDIMF - BCVVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
AMIVF - BCVVF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
BRRAY - BCVVF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASHTY - BCVVF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+3.95%
CSASF - BCVVF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BDIMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BDIMF and AMIVF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDIMF and AMIVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDIMF
1D Price
Change %
BDIMF100%
-0.28%
AMIVF - BDIMF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
BCVVF - BDIMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPRF - BDIMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASHTF - BDIMF
8%
Poorly correlated
+4.03%
ASHTY - BDIMF
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.95%
More