| BCV | CWB | BCV / CWB | |
| Gain YTD | 31.616 | 15.981 | 198% |
| Net Assets | 152M | 4.74B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.40 | 275% |
| Turnover | 88.00 | N/A | - |
| Yield | 1.81 | 1.73 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 54 years | 17 years | - |
| BCV | CWB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 75% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BCV and CCI have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCV and CCI's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with BTSGU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then BTSGU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | -2.61% | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 44% Loosely correlated | -5.05% | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| SO - CWB | -3% Poorly correlated | -0.78% |