| BCV | CWB | BCV / CWB | |
| Gain YTD | 6.041 | 4.731 | 128% |
| Net Assets | 156M | 4.81B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.40 | 275% |
| Turnover | 89.00 | 32.00 | 278% |
| Yield | 2.00 | 1.69 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 54 years | 17 years | - |
| BCV | CWB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 79% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BCV and CCI have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCV and CCI's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with TTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then TTWO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AATRL - CWB | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SO - CWB | -3% Poorly correlated | +0.99% |