Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCUS vs SPLG
BCUS vs SPLG Comparison
Open Charts BCUS vs SPLG
BANCREEK U.S. Large Cap ETF
Price$32.14
Change+$0.28 (+0.88%)
Volume$25.72K
Net Assets93.44M
SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® ETF
Price$78.16
Change+$0.43 (+0.55%)
Volume$17.26M
Net Assets90.62B
BCUS vs SPLG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCUS vs. SPLG commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCUS is a Hold and SPLG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPLG has more net assets: 90.6B vs. BCUS (93.4M). SPLG has a higher annual dividend yield than BCUS: SPLG (14.435) vs BCUS (5.992). BCUS was incepted earlier than SPLG: BCUS (2 years) vs SPLG (20 years). SPLG (0.02) has a lower expense ratio than BCUS (0.70). BCUS has a higher turnover SPLG (3.00) vs SPLG (3.00).
| BCUS | SPLG | BCUS / SPLG | |
| Gain YTD | 5.992 | 14.435 | 42% |
| Net Assets | 93.4M | 90.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.02 | 3,500% |
| Turnover | 207.00 | 3.00 | 6,900% |
| Yield | 0.41 | 1.16 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BCUS | SPLG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 13 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 9 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NVDX | 18.16 | 0.25 | +1.37% |
| T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | |||
| GMOV | 26.11 | 0.23 | +0.88% |
| GMO US Value ETF | |||
| GSIE | 41.18 | 0.04 | +0.10% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Intl Eq ETF | |||
| SMOG | 131.86 | 0.13 | +0.10% |
| VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | |||
| RAYC | 18.01 | -0.22 | -1.18% |
| Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF | |||
BCUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCUS has been closely correlated with CSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCUS jumps, then CSW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCUS | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| CSW - BCUS | 72% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| RSG - BCUS | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| TSCO - BCUS | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| PGR - BCUS | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.75% | ||
| CBOE - BCUS | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
More | ||||