BCUCY
Price
$10.14
Change
-$2.01 (-16.54%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.78B
LVMHF
Price
$587.35
Change
-$10.65 (-1.78%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
295.63B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCUCY vs LVMHF

Header iconBCUCY vs LVMHF Comparison
Open Charts BCUCY vs LVMHFBanner chart's image
Brunello Cucinelli S P A
Price$10.14
Change-$2.01 (-16.54%)
Volume$46.71K
Capitalization6.78B
LVMH-Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton
Price$587.35
Change-$10.65 (-1.78%)
Volume$1.38K
Capitalization295.63B
BCUCY vs LVMHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCUCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCUCY vs. LVMHF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCUCY is a Hold and LVMHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BCUCY: $10.14 vs. LVMHF: $587.35)
Brand notoriety: BCUCY and LVMHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCUCY: 203% vs. LVMHF: 36%
Market capitalization -- BCUCY: $6.78B vs. LVMHF: $295.63B
BCUCY [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $6.78B. LVMHF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $295.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $295.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $40.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCUCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLVMHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCUCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LVMHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCUCY is a better buy in the long-term than LVMHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCUCY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVMHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCUCY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LVMHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCUCY is a better buy in the short-term than LVMHF.

Price Growth

BCUCY (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а -16.06% price change this week, while LVMHF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was -2.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was -2.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (-2.26% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVMHF($296B) has a higher market cap than BCUCY($6.78B). BCUCY has higher P/E ratio than LVMHF: BCUCY (44.27) vs LVMHF (22.60). BCUCY YTD gains are higher at: -7.018 vs. LVMHF (-10.560). LVMHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.5B vs. BCUCY (394M). LVMHF has more cash in the bank: 12.3B vs. BCUCY (244M). BCUCY has less debt than LVMHF: BCUCY (1.23B) vs LVMHF (39.6B). LVMHF has higher revenues than BCUCY: LVMHF (82.8B) vs BCUCY (1.34B).
BCUCYLVMHFBCUCY / LVMHF
Capitalization6.78B296B2%
EBITDA394M25.5B2%
Gain YTD-7.018-10.56066%
P/E Ratio44.2722.60196%
Revenue1.34B82.8B2%
Total Cash244M12.3B2%
Total Debt1.23B39.6B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCUCY vs LVMHF: Fundamental Ratings
BCUCY
LVMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8615
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2678
SMR RATING
1..100
3899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6444
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5026

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LVMHF's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as BCUCY (84). This means that LVMHF’s stock grew similarly to BCUCY’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVMHF (78). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVMHF (99). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMHF (54). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew similarly to LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

LVMHF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BCUCY (64). This means that LVMHF’s stock grew similarly to BCUCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCUCYLVMHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCUCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSFFF27.93N/A
N/A
Basic-Fit N.V.
YARIY18.80N/A
N/A
Yara International ASA
SEUSF0.44N/A
N/A
Sintana Energy, Inc.
CLPMF0.22N/A
N/A
Clip Money Inc.
WELUF12.19N/A
N/A
Integrated Wellness Acquisition Corp.

BCUCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCUCY has been loosely correlated with LVMHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCUCY jumps, then LVMHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCUCY
1D Price
Change %
BCUCY100%
-16.57%
LVMHF - BCUCY
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
LVMUY - BCUCY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
HESAF - BCUCY
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
HESAY - BCUCY
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
PPRUY - BCUCY
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
More

LVMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVMHF has been closely correlated with LVMUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVMHF jumps, then LVMUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVMHF
1D Price
Change %
LVMHF100%
N/A
LVMUY - LVMHF
97%
Closely correlated
N/A
HESAY - LVMHF
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
HESAF - LVMHF
72%
Closely correlated
N/A
PPRUY - LVMHF
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
SWGAY - LVMHF
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More