BCUCY
Price
$11.15
Change
-$0.22 (-1.93%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.76B
CJEWF
Price
$1.90
Change
+$0.20 (+11.76%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
19.69B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCUCY vs CJEWF

Header iconBCUCY vs CJEWF Comparison
Open Charts BCUCY vs CJEWFBanner chart's image
Brunello Cucinelli S P A
Price$11.15
Change-$0.22 (-1.93%)
Volume$11.51K
Capitalization7.76B
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group
Price$1.90
Change+$0.20 (+11.76%)
Volume$625
Capitalization19.69B
BCUCY vs CJEWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCUCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CJEWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCUCY vs. CJEWF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCUCY is a Hold and CJEWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BCUCY: $11.15 vs. CJEWF: $1.90)
Brand notoriety: BCUCY and CJEWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCUCY: 62% vs. CJEWF: 17%
Market capitalization -- BCUCY: $7.76B vs. CJEWF: $19.69B
BCUCY [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $7.76B. CJEWF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $19.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $301.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $39.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCUCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCJEWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCUCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CJEWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CJEWF is a better buy in the long-term than BCUCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCUCY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CJEWF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCUCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • CJEWF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CJEWF is a better buy in the short-term than BCUCY.

Price Growth

BCUCY (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а -6.26% price change this week, while CJEWF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was +11.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+2.43% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CJEWF($19.7B) has a higher market cap than BCUCY($7.76B). BCUCY has higher P/E ratio than CJEWF: BCUCY (49.11) vs CJEWF (25.03). CJEWF YTD gains are higher at: 109.482 vs. BCUCY (2.289).
BCUCYCJEWFBCUCY / CJEWF
Capitalization7.76B19.7B39%
EBITDAN/A8.95B-
Gain YTD2.289109.4822%
P/E Ratio49.1125.03196%
RevenueN/A98.6B-
Total CashN/A3.84B-
Total DebtN/A29.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCUCY vs CJEWF: Fundamental Ratings
BCUCY
CJEWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2147
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2262
SMR RATING
1..100
4497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
617
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CJEWF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BCUCY (90). This means that CJEWF’s stock grew significantly faster than BCUCY’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CJEWF (62). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CJEWF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CJEWF (97). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CJEWF’s over the last 12 months.

CJEWF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BCUCY (58). This means that CJEWF’s stock grew similarly to BCUCY’s over the last 12 months.

CJEWF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCUCY (61). This means that CJEWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCUCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCUCYCJEWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCUCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CJEWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCV21.150.14
+0.67%
Bancroft Fund Ltd
OMFL59.260.36
+0.61%
Invesco Russell 1000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF
NDOW26.470.08
+0.29%
Anydrus Advantage ETF
KIO12.520.02
+0.16%
KKR Income OPPORTUNITIES FUND
AUGZ41.56N/A
N/A
TrueShares Structured Outcome August ETF

BCUCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCUCY has been loosely correlated with LVMHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCUCY jumps, then LVMHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCUCY
1D Price
Change %
BCUCY100%
-1.92%
LVMHF - BCUCY
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
LVMUY - BCUCY
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
HESAF - BCUCY
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
HESAY - BCUCY
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
PPRUY - BCUCY
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
More

CJEWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CJEWF and CHDRY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CJEWF and CHDRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CJEWF
1D Price
Change %
CJEWF100%
N/A
CHDRY - CJEWF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
CFRHF - CJEWF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
BCUCY - CJEWF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
CJEWY - CJEWF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DCOHF - CJEWF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More