BCUCF
Price
$122.38
Change
+$5.38 (+4.60%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
7.78B
CHDRF
Price
$489.96
Change
-$24.14 (-4.70%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
159.49B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCUCF vs CHDRF

Header iconBCUCF vs CHDRF Comparison
Open Charts BCUCF vs CHDRFBanner chart's image
Brunello Cucinelli S P A
Price$122.38
Change+$5.38 (+4.60%)
Volume$100
Capitalization7.78B
Christian Dior S.E
Price$489.96
Change-$24.14 (-4.70%)
Volume$20
Capitalization159.49B
BCUCF vs CHDRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCUCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCUCF vs. CHDRF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCUCF is a Hold and CHDRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BCUCF: $122.38 vs. CHDRF: $489.96)
Brand notoriety: BCUCF and CHDRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCUCF: 84% vs. CHDRF: 144%
Market capitalization -- BCUCF: $7.78B vs. CHDRF: $159.49B
BCUCF [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $7.78B. CHDRF’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $159.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $466.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $55.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCUCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCHDRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCUCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CHDRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCUCF is a better buy in the long-term than CHDRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCUCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHDRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCUCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CHDRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCUCF is a better buy in the short-term than CHDRF.

Price Growth

BCUCF (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CHDRF (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was +1.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +4.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+4.33% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHDRF($159B) has a higher market cap than BCUCF($7.78B). BCUCF has higher P/E ratio than CHDRF: BCUCF (70.95) vs CHDRF (21.98). BCUCF YTD gains are higher at: 37.932 vs. CHDRF (-20.202). CHDRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 29.8B vs. BCUCF (293M). CHDRF has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. BCUCF (91.4M). BCUCF has less debt than CHDRF: BCUCF (672M) vs CHDRF (38.2B). CHDRF has higher revenues than BCUCF: CHDRF (84.7B) vs BCUCF (1.05B).
BCUCFCHDRFBCUCF / CHDRF
Capitalization7.78B159B5%
EBITDA293M29.8B1%
Gain YTD37.932-20.202-188%
P/E Ratio70.9521.98323%
Revenue1.05B84.7B1%
Total Cash91.4M10.5B1%
Total Debt672M38.2B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCUCF vs CHDRF: Fundamental Ratings
BCUCF
CHDRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
778
SMR RATING
1..100
4310
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4584
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4482
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHDRF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCUCF (89). This means that CHDRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCUCF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHDRF (78). This means that BCUCF’s stock grew significantly faster than CHDRF’s over the last 12 months.

CHDRF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCUCF (43). This means that CHDRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCUCF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHDRF (84). This means that BCUCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHDRF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHDRF (82). This means that BCUCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHDRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCUCFCHDRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCUCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRACF1.41N/A
N/A
Foraco International, Marseille
RATIY45.18N/A
N/A
Rational AG
GENSY24.34N/A
N/A
Genus Plc
KINS15.31-0.18
-1.16%
Kingstone Companies
EMTRF0.38-0.01
-1.34%
Element 29 Resources Inc.

BCUCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCUCF and CHDRY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCUCF and CHDRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCUCF
1D Price
Change %
BCUCF100%
N/A
CHDRY - BCUCF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
BURBY - BCUCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+5.81%
BCUCY - BCUCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
CHDRF - BCUCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.70%
CFRHF - BCUCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
More

CHDRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHDRF has been loosely correlated with LVMUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHDRF jumps, then LVMUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHDRF
1D Price
Change %
CHDRF100%
-4.70%
LVMUY - CHDRF
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.74%
LVMHF - CHDRF
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
SWGAY - CHDRF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
HESAY - CHDRF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
PPRUY - CHDRF
32%
Poorly correlated
+5.82%
More