BCUCF
Price
$122.38
Change
+$5.38 (+4.60%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
7.78B
CEBTF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.04 (-66.67%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
658.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCUCF vs CEBTF

Header iconBCUCF vs CEBTF Comparison
Open Charts BCUCF vs CEBTFBanner chart's image
Brunello Cucinelli S P A
Price$122.38
Change+$5.38 (+4.60%)
Volume$100
Capitalization7.78B
Citychamp Watch & Jewellery Group
Price$0.02
Change-$0.04 (-66.67%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization658.59M
BCUCF vs CEBTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCUCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CEBTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCUCF vs. CEBTF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCUCF is a Hold and CEBTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BCUCF: $122.38 vs. CEBTF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: BCUCF and CEBTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCUCF: 84% vs. CEBTF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BCUCF: $7.78B vs. CEBTF: $658.59M
BCUCF [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $7.78B. CEBTF’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $658.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $466.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $55.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCUCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCEBTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCUCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CEBTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCUCF is a better buy in the long-term than CEBTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCUCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CEBTF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCUCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CEBTF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCUCF is a better buy in the short-term than CEBTF.

Price Growth

BCUCF (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CEBTF (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +4.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+4.33% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCUCF($7.78B) has a higher market cap than CEBTF($659M). BCUCF YTD gains are higher at: 37.932 vs. CEBTF (-69.849). BCUCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 293M vs. CEBTF (111M). CEBTF has more cash in the bank: 7B vs. BCUCF (91.4M). BCUCF has less debt than CEBTF: BCUCF (672M) vs CEBTF (1.25B). CEBTF has higher revenues than BCUCF: CEBTF (2.04B) vs BCUCF (1.05B).
BCUCFCEBTFBCUCF / CEBTF
Capitalization7.78B659M1,180%
EBITDA293M111M264%
Gain YTD37.932-69.849-54%
P/E Ratio70.95N/A-
Revenue1.05B2.04B51%
Total Cash91.4M7B1%
Total Debt672M1.25B54%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCUCF vs CEBTF: Fundamental Ratings
BCUCF
CEBTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7100
SMR RATING
1..100
4391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4595
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4484
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCUCF's Valuation (89) in the null industry is in the same range as CEBTF (93). This means that BCUCF’s stock grew similarly to CEBTF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CEBTF (100). This means that BCUCF’s stock grew significantly faster than CEBTF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CEBTF (91). This means that BCUCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CEBTF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CEBTF (95). This means that BCUCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CEBTF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CEBTF (84). This means that BCUCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CEBTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCUCFCEBTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCUCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CEBTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIGFX43.240.25
+0.58%
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk A
DDVRX13.790.08
+0.58%
Macquarie Value R
WTSGX20.550.02
+0.10%
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Gr Ret
HGHAX32.900.01
+0.03%
Hartford Healthcare A
MSVSX9.22-0.02
-0.22%
MassMutual Small Company Val R5

BCUCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCUCF and CHDRY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCUCF and CHDRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCUCF
1D Price
Change %
BCUCF100%
N/A
CHDRY - BCUCF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
BURBY - BCUCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+5.81%
BCUCY - BCUCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
CHDRF - BCUCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.70%
CFRHF - BCUCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
More

CEBTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEBTF and CJEWY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEBTF and CJEWY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEBTF
1D Price
Change %
CEBTF100%
N/A
CJEWY - CEBTF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFRHF - CEBTF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
BCUCY - CEBTF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
BCUCF - CEBTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DCOHF - CEBTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More