BCUCF
Price
$121.45
Change
+$10.45 (+9.41%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
6.78B
BURBY
Price
$15.08
Change
-$0.12 (-0.79%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.46B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCUCF vs BURBY

Header iconBCUCF vs BURBY Comparison
Open Charts BCUCF vs BURBYBanner chart's image
Brunello Cucinelli S P A
Price$121.45
Change+$10.45 (+9.41%)
Volume$135
Capitalization6.78B
Burberry Group
Price$15.08
Change-$0.12 (-0.79%)
Volume$73.98K
Capitalization5.46B
BCUCF vs BURBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCUCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BURBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCUCF vs. BURBY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCUCF is a Buy and BURBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BCUCF: $121.45 vs. BURBY: $15.08)
Brand notoriety: BCUCF and BURBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCUCF: 61% vs. BURBY: 117%
Market capitalization -- BCUCF: $6.78B vs. BURBY: $5.46B
BCUCF [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $6.78B. BURBY’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $5.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $295.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $40.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCUCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBURBY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCUCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BURBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCUCF is a better buy in the long-term than BURBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCUCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BURBY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCUCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • BURBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCUCF is a better buy in the short-term than BURBY.

Price Growth

BCUCF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а +9.41% price change this week, while BURBY (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was -3.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was -2.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

BURBY is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (-2.26% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCUCF($6.78B) has a higher market cap than BURBY($5.46B). BURBY has higher P/E ratio than BCUCF: BURBY (88.78) vs BCUCF (53.02). BCUCF YTD gains are higher at: 36.890 vs. BURBY (24.834). BURBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 428M vs. BCUCF (394M). BURBY has more cash in the bank: 813M vs. BCUCF (244M). BCUCF has less debt than BURBY: BCUCF (1.23B) vs BURBY (1.92B). BURBY has higher revenues than BCUCF: BURBY (2.46B) vs BCUCF (1.34B).
BCUCFBURBYBCUCF / BURBY
Capitalization6.78B5.46B124%
EBITDA394M428M92%
Gain YTD36.89024.834149%
P/E Ratio53.0288.7860%
Revenue1.34B2.46B55%
Total Cash244M813M30%
Total Debt1.23B1.92B64%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCUCF vs BURBY: Fundamental Ratings
BCUCF
BURBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4986
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8100
SMR RATING
1..100
3895
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
492
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BURBY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BCUCF (91). This means that BURBY’s stock grew significantly faster than BCUCF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BURBY (100). This means that BCUCF’s stock grew significantly faster than BURBY’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BURBY (95). This means that BCUCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BURBY’s over the last 12 months.

BURBY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BCUCF (50). This means that BURBY’s stock grew similarly to BCUCF’s over the last 12 months.

BURBY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCUCF (49). This means that BURBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCUCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCUCFBURBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCUCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BURBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRSH3.220.12
+3.87%
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
DBJP86.100.13
+0.15%
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
DFGR26.91-0.14
-0.52%
Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF
WTRE21.82-0.35
-1.58%
WisdomTree New Economy Real Estate ETF
CNBS26.34-2.03
-7.15%
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF

BCUCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCUCF and CHDRY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCUCF and CHDRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCUCF
1D Price
Change %
BCUCF100%
N/A
CHDRY - BCUCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-9.21%
BURBY - BCUCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
BCUCY - BCUCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-16.57%
CHDRF - BCUCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFRHF - BCUCF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
More

BURBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BURBY has been loosely correlated with CFRUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BURBY jumps, then CFRUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BURBY
1D Price
Change %
BURBY100%
-0.79%
CFRUY - BURBY
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
BBRYF - BURBY
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SWGAY - BURBY
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
TPR - BURBY
39%
Loosely correlated
-4.96%
PPRUY - BURBY
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
More