BCTF
Price
$12.25
Change
-$0.14 (-1.13%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
30.93M
UBOH
Price
$28.02
Change
+$0.02 (+0.07%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
56.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCTF vs UBOH

Header iconBCTF vs UBOH Comparison
Open Charts BCTF vs UBOHBanner chart's image
Bancorp 34
Price$12.25
Change-$0.14 (-1.13%)
Volume$1.22K
Capitalization30.93M
United Bancshares
Price$28.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
Volume$455
Capitalization56.14M
BCTF vs UBOH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBOH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCTF vs. UBOH commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCTF is a Hold and UBOH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BCTF: $12.25 vs. UBOH: $28.02)
Brand notoriety: BCTF and UBOH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCTF: 30% vs. UBOH: 28%
Market capitalization -- BCTF: $30.93M vs. UBOH: $56.14M
BCTF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $30.93M. UBOH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $56.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUBOH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UBOH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBOH is a better buy in the long-term than BCTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBOH’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UBOH’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCTF is a better buy in the short-term than UBOH.

Price Growth

BCTF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.29% price change this week, while UBOH (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBOH($56.1M) has a higher market cap than BCTF($30.9M). BCTF has higher P/E ratio than UBOH: BCTF (6.07) vs UBOH (5.62). BCTF YTD gains are higher at: 3.638 vs. UBOH (-8.150). UBOH has less debt than BCTF: UBOH (18.8M) vs BCTF (20M). UBOH has higher revenues than BCTF: UBOH (42.8M) vs BCTF (19.2M).
BCTFUBOHBCTF / UBOH
Capitalization30.9M56.1M55%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.638-8.150-45%
P/E Ratio6.075.62108%
Revenue19.2M42.8M45%
Total Cash8.2MN/A-
Total Debt20M18.8M106%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCTF vs UBOH: Fundamental Ratings
BCTF
UBOH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7749
SMR RATING
1..100
7653
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9916
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBOH's Valuation (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BCTF (41) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UBOH’s stock grew similarly to BCTF’s over the last 12 months.

UBOH's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BCTF (77) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UBOH’s stock grew similarly to BCTF’s over the last 12 months.

UBOH's SMR Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BCTF (76) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UBOH’s stock grew similarly to BCTF’s over the last 12 months.

UBOH's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BCTF (54) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UBOH’s stock grew similarly to BCTF’s over the last 12 months.

UBOH's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BCTF (99) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UBOH’s stock grew significantly faster than BCTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCTFUBOH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBOH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKRKY11.420.05
+0.44%
Bank Rakyat
APRAF0.25N/A
N/A
Trailbreaker Resources Ltd.
GRKZF21.96N/A
N/A
Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA
WEGYF0.43N/A
N/A
WESTBRIDGE RENEWABLE ENERGY CORP.
ORGJF53.03N/A
N/A
Organo Corp.

BCTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCTF and INFT have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCTF and INFT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCTF
1D Price
Change %
BCTF100%
-1.10%
INFT - BCTF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
UBOH - BCTF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
BCAL - BCTF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
OFED - BCTF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
CLBK - BCTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
More

UBOH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UBOH and FNWD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBOH and FNWD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBOH
1D Price
Change %
UBOH100%
+0.07%
FNWD - UBOH
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
ALRS - UBOH
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
CCNE - UBOH
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
GNTY - UBOH
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
PCB - UBOH
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
More