Advertisement
BCTF vs CLBK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCTF is a Hold and CLBK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BCTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CLBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BCTF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLBK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BCTF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CLBK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BCTF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.57% price change this week, while CLBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.28%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLBK is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.14% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BCTF | CLBK | BCTF / CLBK | |
| Capitalization | 82.9M | 1.58B | 5% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.161 | -5.060 | -102% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.29 | 214.43 | 7% |
| Revenue | 29.8M | 200M | 15% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 32M | 1.27B | 3% |
BCTF | CLBK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 35 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BCTF's Valuation (60) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLBK (100). This means that BCTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLBK’s over the last 12 months.
CLBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BCTF (80). This means that CLBK’s stock grew similarly to BCTF’s over the last 12 months.
CLBK's SMR Rating (42) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCTF (84). This means that CLBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCTF’s over the last 12 months.
BCTF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CLBK (57). This means that BCTF’s stock grew similarly to CLBK’s over the last 12 months.
CLBK's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BCTF (98). This means that CLBK’s stock grew significantly faster than BCTF’s over the last 12 months.
| BCTF | CLBK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 37% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 33% | 7 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 30% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
BCTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BCTF and INFT have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCTF and INFT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCTF | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| INFT - BCTF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UBOH - BCTF | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.47% | ||
| BCAL - BCTF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| OFED - BCTF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CLBK - BCTF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||
CLBK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLBK has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLBK jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLBK | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| FMBH - CLBK | 81% Closely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| FCF - CLBK | 81% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| CATY - CLBK | 80% Closely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| MCBS - CLBK | 79% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| EFSC - CLBK | 79% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||