BCSF
Price
$14.03
Change
+$0.20 (+1.45%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
896.48M
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CEVIY
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
2.31B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCSF vs CEVIY

Header iconBCSF vs CEVIY Comparison
Open Charts BCSF vs CEVIYBanner chart's image
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
Price$14.03
Change+$0.20 (+1.45%)
Volume$3.56K
Capitalization896.48M
China Everbright IHD Pacific
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$201
Capitalization2.31B
BCSF vs CEVIY Comparison Chart in %
BCSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CEVIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCSF vs. CEVIY commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCSF is a Hold and CEVIY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (BCSF: $13.82 vs. CEVIY: $5.15)
Brand notoriety: BCSF and CEVIY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCSF: 84% vs. CEVIY: 100%
Market capitalization -- BCSF: $910.11M vs. CEVIY: $2.27B
BCSF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $910.11M. CEVIY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCEVIY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CEVIY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCSF is a better buy in the long-term than CEVIY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CEVIY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CEVIY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CEVIY is a better buy in the short-term than BCSF.

Price Growth

BCSF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.07% price change this week, while CEVIY (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCSF is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.83% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEVIY($2.31B) has a higher market cap than BCSF($896M). CEVIY YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BCSF (-0.647). CEVIY has higher revenues than BCSF: CEVIY (1.4B) vs BCSF (110M).
BCSFCEVIYBCSF / CEVIY
Capitalization896M2.31B39%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.6470.000-
P/E Ratio9.60N/A-
Revenue110M1.4B8%
Total Cash60.6MN/A-
Total Debt1.5BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCSF vs CEVIY: Fundamental Ratings
BCSF
CEVIY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1842
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32100
SMR RATING
1..100
4198
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6073
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3948
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCSF's Valuation (6) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as CEVIY (20) in the null industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew similarly to CEVIY’s over the last 12 months.

BCSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is significantly better than the same rating for CEVIY (100) in the null industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than CEVIY’s over the last 12 months.

BCSF's SMR Rating (41) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CEVIY (98) in the null industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CEVIY’s over the last 12 months.

BCSF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as CEVIY (73) in the null industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew similarly to CEVIY’s over the last 12 months.

BCSF's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as CEVIY (48) in the null industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew similarly to CEVIY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSFCEVIY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
48%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CEVIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AHSAX23.440.12
+0.51%
Alger Health Sciences A
BRXRX17.570.08
+0.46%
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq R1
AEMSX17.59N/A
N/A
abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc
GCPAX22.46-0.08
-0.35%
Gateway Equity Call Premium A
RRCOX66.98-0.42
-0.62%
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research R

BCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCSF has been closely correlated with TSLX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCSF jumps, then TSLX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCSF
1D Price
Change %
BCSF100%
+1.32%
TSLX - BCSF
83%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
GBDC - BCSF
83%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
GSBD - BCSF
82%
Closely correlated
+2.43%
SLRC - BCSF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
MFIC - BCSF
81%
Closely correlated
+2.32%
More

CEVIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEVIY and CYMBF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEVIY and CYMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEVIY
1D Price
Change %
CEVIY100%
N/A
CYMBF - CEVIY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSWC - CEVIY
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
BCSF - CEVIY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
APO - CEVIY
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
MGLD - CEVIY
1%
Poorly correlated
-6.06%
More