Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCSAX vs SKNRX
BCSAX vs SKNRX Comparison
Open Charts BCSAX vs SKNRX
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Inv A
Price$9.83
Change-$0.14 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets742.3M
DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy A
Price$5.76
Change-$0.06 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets842.16M
BCSAX vs SKNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCSAX vs. SKNRX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCSAX is a Buy and SKNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKNRX has more cash in the bank: 842M vs. BCSAX (742M). SKNRX pays higher dividends than BCSAX: SKNRX (4.27) vs BCSAX (3.09). BCSAX was incepted earlier than SKNRX: BCSAX (14 years) vs SKNRX (21 years). SKNRX (1.39) is less costly to investors than BCSAX (1.14). BCSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. SKNRX (85.00). SKNRX initial investment is less costly to investors than BCSAX (5%) vs BCSAX (5%). BCSAX (1000) and SKNRX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BCSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.26 vs. SKNRX (7.50). BCSAX return over 5 years is better than : 81.01 vs. SKNRX (56.04).
| BCSAX | SKNRX | BCSAX / SKNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.10 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.39 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.322 | 7.616 | 280% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 742M | 842M | 88% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.09 | 4.27 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.26 | 7.50 | 217% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.70 | 6.55 | 438% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.01 | 56.04 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.84 | 34.95 | 274% |