BCS
Price
$13.16
Change
-$1.15 (-8.04%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
34.89B
26 days until earnings call
WFC
Price
$60.91
Change
-$4.75 (-7.23%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
203.96B
7 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BCS vs WFC

Header iconBCS vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts BCS vs WFCBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$13.16
Change-$1.15 (-8.04%)
Volume$8.77K
Capitalization34.89B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$60.91
Change-$4.75 (-7.23%)
Volume$123.88K
Capitalization203.96B
BCS vs WFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCS vs. WFC commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCS is a Hold and WFC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BCS: $14.31 vs. WFC: $65.67)
Brand notoriety: BCS and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCS: 120% vs. WFC: 161%
Market capitalization -- BCS: $34.89B vs. WFC: $203.96B
BCS [@Major Banks] is valued at $34.89B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $203.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCS is a better buy in the long-term than WFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the short-term than BCS.

Price Growth

BCS (@Major Banks) experienced а -9.89% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was -9.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -4.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCS is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-4.68% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFC($204B) has a higher market cap than BCS($34.9B). WFC has higher P/E ratio than BCS: WFC (11.93) vs BCS (6.84). BCS YTD gains are higher at: 9.587 vs. WFC (-6.045). BCS has less debt than WFC: BCS (177B) vs WFC (219B). WFC has higher revenues than BCS: WFC (82.6B) vs BCS (25.4B).
BCSWFCBCS / WFC
Capitalization34.9B204B17%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.587-6.045-159%
P/E Ratio6.8411.9357%
Revenue25.4B82.6B31%
Total CashN/A33B-
Total Debt177B219B81%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCS vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
BCS
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6974
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1615
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2235
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCS's Valuation (16) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for WFC (82). This means that BCS’s stock grew significantly faster than WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (16). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (4). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (46). This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (35). This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X83102.830000617.109400
+0.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY536.70-27.82
-4.93%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA267.28-15.48
-5.47%
Tesla
GME21.10-1.59
-7.01%
GameStop Corp
AAPL203.19-20.70
-9.25%
Apple

BCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCS has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCS jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCS
1D Price
Change %
BCS100%
-9.09%
HSBC - BCS
58%
Loosely correlated
-7.71%
SCBFY - BCS
58%
Loosely correlated
-11.50%
SAN - BCS
56%
Loosely correlated
-4.09%
WFC - BCS
55%
Loosely correlated
-9.12%
ING - BCS
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.89%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
-9.12%
BAC - WFC
79%
Closely correlated
-11.06%
JPM - WFC
76%
Closely correlated
-6.97%
C - WFC
74%
Closely correlated
-12.14%
CM - WFC
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
BCS - WFC
55%
Loosely correlated
-9.09%
More