BCS
Price
$20.06
Change
+$0.12 (+0.60%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
69.7B
72 days until earnings call
WFC
Price
$77.61
Change
-$0.24 (-0.31%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
249.39B
64 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCS vs WFC

Header iconBCS vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts BCS vs WFCBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$20.06
Change+$0.12 (+0.60%)
Volume$32.99K
Capitalization69.7B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$77.61
Change-$0.24 (-0.31%)
Volume$129.86K
Capitalization249.39B
BCS vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCS vs. WFC commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCS is a Buy and WFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BCS: $19.94 vs. WFC: $77.85)
Brand notoriety: BCS and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCS: 81% vs. WFC: 78%
Market capitalization -- BCS: $69.7B vs. WFC: $249.39B
BCS [@Major Banks] is valued at $69.7B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $249.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $794.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCS is a better buy in the long-term than WFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCS is a better buy in the short-term than WFC.

Price Growth

BCS (@Major Banks) experienced а +5.25% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.69% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFC($249B) has a higher market cap than BCS($69.7B). WFC has higher P/E ratio than BCS: WFC (13.38) vs BCS (9.15). BCS YTD gains are higher at: 53.948 vs. WFC (12.650).
BCSWFCBCS / WFC
Capitalization69.7B249B28%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD53.94812.650426%
P/E Ratio9.1513.3868%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A35.3B-
Total DebtN/A189B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCS vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
BCS
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1011
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3928
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCS's Valuation (66) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (81). This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (11). This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (4). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (49). This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (39). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVOL17.030.16
+0.95%
Simplify Volatility Premium ETF
AVSD68.880.32
+0.47%
Avantis Responsible International Eq ETF
OASC26.310.10
+0.40%
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF
JPMB39.26N/A
+0.01%
JPMorgan USD Emerging Mkts Svr Bd ETF
IWR92.84-0.32
-0.34%
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF

BCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCS has been closely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCS jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCS
1D Price
Change %
BCS100%
+1.79%
HSBC - BCS
70%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
C - BCS
67%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
SAN - BCS
66%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
WFC - BCS
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
BK - BCS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
+1.63%
BAC - WFC
86%
Closely correlated
+2.47%
JPM - WFC
82%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
C - WFC
81%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
BK - WFC
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
BCS - WFC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
More