BCS
Price
$20.02
Change
+$0.33 (+1.68%)
Updated
Sep 4, 01:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
68B
48 days until earnings call
SCBFY
Price
$36.78
Change
-$0.34 (-0.92%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
42.73B
56 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCS vs SCBFY

Header iconBCS vs SCBFY Comparison
Open Charts BCS vs SCBFYBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$20.02
Change+$0.33 (+1.68%)
Volume$4.6K
Capitalization68B
Standard Chartered
Price$36.78
Change-$0.34 (-0.92%)
Volume$42.72K
Capitalization42.73B
BCS vs SCBFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCS vs. SCBFY commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCS is a StrongBuy and SCBFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BCS: $19.68 vs. SCBFY: $36.78)
Brand notoriety: BCS: Notable vs. SCBFY: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCS: 57% vs. SCBFY: 35%
Market capitalization -- BCS: $68B vs. SCBFY: $42.73B
BCS [@Major Banks] is valued at $68B. SCBFY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $42.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $823.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCBFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BCS and SCBFY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBFY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCBFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCS is a better buy in the short-term than SCBFY.

Price Growth

BCS (@Major Banks) experienced а -2.24% price change this week, while SCBFY (@Major Banks) price change was -1.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

SCBFY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCS($68B) has a higher market cap than SCBFY($42.7B). SCBFY has higher P/E ratio than BCS: SCBFY (10.11) vs BCS (8.97). BCS (51.941) and SCBFY (51.134) have similar YTD gains .
BCSSCBFYBCS / SCBFY
Capitalization68B42.7B159%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD51.94151.134102%
P/E Ratio8.9710.1189%
RevenueN/A20.5B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A99.4B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCS vs SCBFY: Fundamental Ratings
BCS
SCBFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8579
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
109
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4432
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCS's Valuation (56) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SCBFY (58) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (10) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's SMR Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SCBFY (6) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (44) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (44) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSSCBFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JEPQ55.250.35
+0.64%
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Inc ETF
SRET21.730.08
+0.36%
Global X SuperDividend® REIT ETF
ITDD33.970.12
+0.35%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF
INCM27.540.01
+0.04%
Franklin Income Focus ETF
BDIV21.66N/A
N/A
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF

BCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCS has been closely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCS jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCS
1D Price
Change %
BCS100%
+0.61%
HSBC - BCS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
WFC - BCS
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
C - BCS
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
SAN - BCS
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ING - BCS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
More

SCBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFY has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFY jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFY
1D Price
Change %
SCBFY100%
-0.92%
HSBC - SCBFY
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
BCS - SCBFY
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
ING - SCBFY
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
SAN - SCBFY
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AAVMY - SCBFY
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
More