BCS
Price
$20.33
Change
-$0.11 (-0.54%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
69.67B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SCBFY
Price
$38.68
Change
-$0.17 (-0.44%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
44.24B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCS vs SCBFY

Header iconBCS vs SCBFY Comparison
Open Charts BCS vs SCBFYBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$20.33
Change-$0.11 (-0.54%)
Volume$32.86K
Capitalization69.67B
Standard Chartered
Price$38.68
Change-$0.17 (-0.44%)
Volume$49.89K
Capitalization44.24B
BCS vs SCBFY Comparison Chart in %
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCS vs. SCBFY commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCS is a Hold and SCBFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (BCS: $20.44 vs. SCBFY: $38.68)
Brand notoriety: BCS: Notable vs. SCBFY: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCS: 97% vs. SCBFY: 41%
Market capitalization -- BCS: $69.67B vs. SCBFY: $44.24B
BCS [@Major Banks] is valued at $69.67B. SCBFY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $44.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $822.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCBFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BCS and SCBFY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBFY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCBFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCS is a better buy in the short-term than SCBFY.

Price Growth

BCS (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCBFY (@Major Banks) price change was -0.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

SCBFY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.52% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCS($69.7B) has a higher market cap than SCBFY($44.2B). SCBFY has higher P/E ratio than BCS: SCBFY (10.63) vs BCS (9.46). SCBFY (58.941) and BCS (57.808) have similar YTD gains . SCBFY has less debt than BCS: SCBFY (99.4B) vs BCS (117B). BCS has higher revenues than SCBFY: BCS (27.8B) vs SCBFY (20.5B).
BCSSCBFYBCS / SCBFY
Capitalization69.7B44.2B158%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD57.80858.94198%
P/E Ratio9.4610.6389%
Revenue27.8B20.5B136%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt117B99.4B118%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCS vs SCBFY: Fundamental Ratings
BCS
SCBFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8376
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3718
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7540

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCS's Valuation (61) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SCBFY (63) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (9) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's SMR Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SCBFY (6) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (44) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (37) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSSCBFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BUYZ42.620.63
+1.49%
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
XHS101.571.42
+1.41%
SPDR® S&P Health Care Services ETF
CCMG30.840.24
+0.77%
CCM Global Equity ETF
MGK399.21-3.39
-0.84%
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
GLO5.68-0.06
-1.05%
Clough Global Opportunities Fund

BCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCS has been closely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCS jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCS
1D Price
Change %
BCS100%
+1.79%
NWG - BCS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
HSBC - BCS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
WFC - BCS
67%
Closely correlated
+7.15%
C - BCS
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.89%
SAN - BCS
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
More

SCBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFY has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFY jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFY
1D Price
Change %
SCBFY100%
-0.44%
HSBC - SCBFY
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
BCS - SCBFY
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
ING - SCBFY
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
SAN - SCBFY
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
SCBFF - SCBFY
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
More