BCS
Price
$26.51
Change
-$1.01 (-3.67%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
94.78B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SAN
Price
$12.43
Change
+$0.20 (+1.64%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
185.56B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCS vs SAN

Header iconBCS vs SAN Comparison
Open Charts BCS vs SANBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$26.51
Change-$1.01 (-3.67%)
Volume$26.87K
Capitalization94.78B
Banco Santander SA
Price$12.43
Change+$0.20 (+1.64%)
Volume$52.94M
Capitalization185.56B
BCS vs SAN Comparison Chart in %
BCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCS vs. SAN commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCS is a StrongBuy and SAN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BCS: $26.52 vs. SAN: $12.43)
Brand notoriety: BCS: Notable vs. SAN: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCS: 171% vs. SAN: 954%
Market capitalization -- BCS: $94.78B vs. SAN: $185.56B
BCS [@Major Banks] is valued at $94.78B. SAN’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $185.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $855.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $147.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SAN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCS is a better buy in the long-term than SAN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BCS and SAN are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BCS (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.11% price change this week, while SAN (@Major Banks) price change was -1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCS is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

SAN is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.20% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAN($186B) has a higher market cap than BCS($94.8B). SAN (12.46) and BCS (11.92) have similar P/E ratio . BCS YTD gains are higher at: 8.134 vs. SAN (4.263). BCS has less debt than SAN: BCS (122B) vs SAN (317B). SAN has higher revenues than BCS: SAN (63.8B) vs BCS (28.5B).
BCSSANBCS / SAN
Capitalization94.8B186B51%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.1344.263191%
P/E Ratio11.9212.4696%
Revenue28.5B63.8B45%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt122B317B38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCS vs SAN: Fundamental Ratings
BCS
SAN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2156
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3210
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCS's Valuation (69) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SAN (83). This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (6). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (5). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (40). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (32). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSSAN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ONEY121.501.39
+1.16%
State Street® SPDR® Russell 1000 YFocETF
GEND12.490.12
+0.94%
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF
IBII25.890.03
+0.10%
iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term Tips ETF
PY52.93-0.20
-0.37%
Principal Value ETF
IWB377.31-3.26
-0.86%
iShares Russell 1000 ETF

BCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCS has been closely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCS jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCS
1D Price
Change %
BCS100%
+0.04%
NWG - BCS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
HSBC - BCS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
WFC - BCS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
SAN - BCS
64%
Loosely correlated
-6.36%
C - BCS
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
More

SAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAN
1D Price
Change %
SAN100%
-6.36%
BBVA - SAN
81%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
BCS - SAN
75%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
ING - SAN
74%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
HSBC - SAN
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
MUFG - SAN
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
More