BCS
Price
$26.46
Change
-$1.06 (-3.85%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:25 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
94.23B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RBSPF
Price
$9.52
Change
+$2.40 (+33.71%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
74.6B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCS vs RBSPF

Header iconBCS vs RBSPF Comparison
Open Charts BCS vs RBSPFBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$26.46
Change-$1.06 (-3.85%)
Volume$3.87K
Capitalization94.23B
NatWest Group
Price$9.52
Change+$2.40 (+33.71%)
Volume$220.79K
Capitalization74.6B
BCS vs RBSPF Comparison Chart in %
BCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RBSPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCS vs. RBSPF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCS is a StrongBuy and RBSPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (BCS: $27.52 vs. RBSPF: $9.52)
Brand notoriety: BCS: Notable vs. RBSPF: Not notable
BCS represents the Major Banks, while RBSPF is part of the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCS: 141% vs. RBSPF: 761%
Market capitalization -- BCS: $94.23B vs. RBSPF: $74.6B
BCS [@Major Banks] is valued at $94.23B. RBSPF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $74.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $848.9B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $146.45B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRBSPF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RBSPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BCS and RBSPF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBSPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RBSPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BCS and RBSPF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BCS (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.21% price change this week, while RBSPF (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.63%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCS is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.93% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

@Regional Banks (+3.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCS($94.2B) has a higher market cap than RBSPF($74.6B). BCS has higher P/E ratio than RBSPF: BCS (12.39) vs RBSPF (10.81). BCS (8.134) and RBSPF (7.998) have similar YTD gains . RBSPF has less debt than BCS: RBSPF (6.14B) vs BCS (122B). BCS has higher revenues than RBSPF: BCS (28.5B) vs RBSPF (16.1B).
BCSRBSPFBCS / RBSPF
Capitalization94.2B74.6B126%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.1347.998102%
P/E Ratio12.3910.81115%
Revenue28.5B16.1B177%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt122B6.14B1,988%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCS vs RBSPF: Fundamental Ratings
BCS
RBSPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2126
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3222
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCS's Valuation (69) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RBSPF (85) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to RBSPF’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (6) in the Major Banks industry. This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (5) in the Major Banks industry. This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (40) in the Major Banks industry. This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (32) in the Major Banks industry. This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSRBSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RBSPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLTW30.372.26
+8.04%
Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF
SAMM31.160.06
+0.19%
Strategas Macro Momentum ETF
IGA9.86-0.04
-0.40%
Voya Global Advantage AND Premium Opportunity Fund
GSLC132.75-1.33
-0.99%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US LgCp Eq ETF
ECC5.00-0.19
-3.66%
Eagle Point Credit Company

BCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCS has been closely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCS jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCS
1D Price
Change %
BCS100%
+0.04%
NWG - BCS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
HSBC - BCS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
WFC - BCS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
SAN - BCS
64%
Loosely correlated
-6.36%
C - BCS
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
More

RBSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBSPF and TD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBSPF and TD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBSPF
1D Price
Change %
RBSPF100%
+0.05%
TD - RBSPF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
BCS - RBSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
ING - RBSPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
NABZY - RBSPF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
INGVF - RBSPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More