BCS
Price
$22.23
Change
-$0.27 (-1.20%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
78.38B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MUFG
Price
$15.44
Change
-$0.10 (-0.64%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
180.94B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCS vs MUFG

Header iconBCS vs MUFG Comparison
Open Charts BCS vs MUFGBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$22.23
Change-$0.27 (-1.20%)
Volume$39.21K
Capitalization78.38B
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$15.44
Change-$0.10 (-0.64%)
Volume$4.57M
Capitalization180.94B
BCS vs MUFG Comparison Chart in %
BCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MUFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCS vs. MUFG commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCS is a Buy and MUFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BCS: $22.51 vs. MUFG: $15.54)
Brand notoriety: BCS: Notable vs. MUFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCS: 80% vs. MUFG: 123%
Market capitalization -- BCS: $78.38B vs. MUFG: $180.94B
BCS [@Major Banks] is valued at $78.38B. MUFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $180.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $842.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $142.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMUFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MUFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCS is a better buy in the long-term than MUFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MUFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the short-term than BCS.

Price Growth

BCS (@Major Banks) experienced а +5.88% price change this week, while MUFG (@Major Banks) price change was +3.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCS is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.91% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUFG($181B) has a higher market cap than BCS($78.4B). MUFG has higher P/E ratio than BCS: MUFG (14.91) vs BCS (10.44). BCS YTD gains are higher at: 73.790 vs. MUFG (32.594). BCS has less debt than MUFG: BCS (117B) vs MUFG (46.25T). MUFG has higher revenues than BCS: MUFG (6.72T) vs BCS (27.8B).
BCSMUFGBCS / MUFG
Capitalization78.4B181B43%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD73.79032.594226%
P/E Ratio10.4414.9170%
Revenue27.8B6.72T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt117B46.25T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCS vs MUFG: Fundamental Ratings
BCS
MUFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2215
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
712
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2736
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCS's Valuation (64) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (88). This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (12). This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (5). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (48). This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (36). This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSMUFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MUFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EFV70.990.51
+0.72%
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
EDEN111.750.68
+0.61%
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
RA13.24-0.03
-0.23%
Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund
OILU24.21-1.10
-4.35%
MicroSectorsTM Oil&Gs Exp&Pd 3X Lvg ETNs
XRPT9.04-0.45
-4.74%
2x XRP ETF

BCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCS has been closely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCS jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCS
1D Price
Change %
BCS100%
+1.49%
HSBC - BCS
70%
Closely correlated
+1.32%
NWG - BCS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
WFC - BCS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
C - BCS
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
SAN - BCS
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
More

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+2.30%
SMFG - MUFG
83%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
BCS - MUFG
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
HSBC - MUFG
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
UBS - MUFG
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
WFC - MUFG
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
More