BCML
Price
$27.60
Change
+$0.39 (+1.43%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
297.71M
66 days until earnings call
FVCB
Price
$12.44
Change
+$0.08 (+0.65%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
221.28M
78 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCML vs FVCB

Header iconBCML vs FVCB Comparison
Open Charts BCML vs FVCBBanner chart's image
BayCom
Price$27.60
Change+$0.39 (+1.43%)
Volume$415
Capitalization297.71M
FVCBank
Price$12.44
Change+$0.08 (+0.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization221.28M
BCML vs FVCB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FVCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCML vs. FVCB commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCML is a StrongBuy and FVCB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BCML: $27.21 vs. FVCB: $12.36)
Brand notoriety: BCML and FVCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCML: 36% vs. FVCB: 41%
Market capitalization -- BCML: $301.65M vs. FVCB: $223.8M
BCML [@Regional Banks] is valued at $301.65M. FVCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $223.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCML’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFVCB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCML’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FVCB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCML is a better buy in the long-term than FVCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCML’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FVCB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCML’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FVCB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FVCB is a better buy in the short-term than BCML.

Price Growth

BCML (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.72% price change this week, while FVCB (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCML is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

FVCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCML($298M) has a higher market cap than FVCB($221M). BCML has higher P/E ratio than FVCB: BCML (12.48) vs FVCB (11.06). BCML YTD gains are higher at: 2.735 vs. FVCB (-1.223). BCML has more cash in the bank: 21M vs. FVCB (13M). FVCB has less debt than BCML: FVCB (26M) vs BCML (87.5M).
BCMLFVCBBCML / FVCB
Capitalization298M221M135%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.735-1.223-224%
P/E Ratio12.4811.06113%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash21M13M162%
Total Debt87.5M26M337%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCML vs FVCB: Fundamental Ratings
BCML
FVCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1965
SMR RATING
1..100
5155
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2799
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FVCB's Valuation (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BCML (62). This means that FVCB’s stock grew similarly to BCML’s over the last 12 months.

BCML's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FVCB (65). This means that BCML’s stock grew somewhat faster than FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

BCML's SMR Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FVCB (55). This means that BCML’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

BCML's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FVCB (56). This means that BCML’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

BCML's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FVCB (99). This means that BCML’s stock grew significantly faster than FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCMLFVCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FVCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HVGDF0.090.03
+50.00%
Harvest Gold Corp.
MCBK26.65N/A
N/A
Madison County Financial, Inc.
WPPGF5.42N/A
N/A
WPP PLC
BTSDF1.26N/A
N/A
Health & Happiness International Holdings Ltd.
BEIGF15.95N/A
N/A
BeOne Medicines Ltd.

BCML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCML has been closely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCML jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCML
1D Price
Change %
BCML100%
+0.82%
MCBS - BCML
78%
Closely correlated
N/A
GSBC - BCML
77%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
FCBC - BCML
77%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
AROW - BCML
76%
Closely correlated
+3.47%
FRBA - BCML
76%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
More

FVCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FVCB has been loosely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FVCB jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FVCB
1D Price
Change %
FVCB100%
N/A
MCBS - FVCB
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AROW - FVCB
63%
Loosely correlated
+3.47%
BCML - FVCB
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
PCB - FVCB
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
HTB - FVCB
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
More