BCLYF
Price
$5.37
Change
-$0.12 (-2.19%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
77.52B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WFC
Price
$84.70
Change
-$1.55 (-1.80%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
270.78B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCLYF vs WFC

Header iconBCLYF vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts BCLYF vs WFCBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$5.37
Change-$0.12 (-2.19%)
Volume$30.93K
Capitalization77.52B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$84.70
Change-$1.55 (-1.80%)
Volume$97.09K
Capitalization270.78B
BCLYF vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCLYF vs. WFC commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLYF is a Buy and WFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BCLYF: $5.37 vs. WFC: $86.26)
Brand notoriety: BCLYF: Not notable vs. WFC: Notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCLYF: 62% vs. WFC: 111%
Market capitalization -- BCLYF: $78.38B vs. WFC: $265.88B
BCLYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $78.38B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $265.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $842.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $142.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCLYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCLYF is a better buy in the long-term than WFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCLYF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCLYF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCLYF is a better buy in the short-term than WFC.

Price Growth

BCLYF (@Major Banks) experienced а +3.27% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was -0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

WFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.91% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFC($271B) has a higher market cap than BCLYF($77.5B). WFC has higher P/E ratio than BCLYF: WFC (14.21) vs BCLYF (10.06). BCLYF YTD gains are higher at: 62.236 vs. WFC (25.476). BCLYF has less debt than WFC: BCLYF (117B) vs WFC (214B). WFC has higher revenues than BCLYF: WFC (82.8B) vs BCLYF (27.8B).
BCLYFWFCBCLYF / WFC
Capitalization77.5B271B29%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD62.23625.476244%
P/E Ratio10.0614.2171%
Revenue27.8B82.8B34%
Total CashN/A34.8B-
Total Debt117B214B55%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCLYF vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
BCLYF
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3078
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
138
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4122
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3050
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCLYF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as WFC (79) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (13) in the null industry. This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (5) in the null industry. This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Price Growth Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (41) in the null industry. This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCLYF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as WFC (50) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCLYFWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCLYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QUAL197.010.49
+0.25%
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
QQQY24.680.01
+0.04%
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Target 30 Income ETF
IBTJ21.97-0.01
-0.05%
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Tr ETF
FFLS24.74-0.14
-0.57%
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
METU28.21-1.75
-5.84%
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCLYF has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCLYF jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
-2.19%
BCS - BCLYF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
SAN - BCLYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
ING - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
AAVMY - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
WFC - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
+0.08%
BAC - WFC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
C - WFC
80%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
JPM - WFC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
BK - WFC
72%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
EWBC - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
More