BCLYF
Price
$3.54
Change
-$0.12 (-3.28%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
30.97B
MUFG
Price
$12.23
Change
+$0.11 (+0.91%)
Updated
Jan 23, 03:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
116.09B
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BCLYF vs MUFG

Header iconBCLYF vs MUFG Comparison
Open Charts BCLYF vs MUFGBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$3.54
Change-$0.12 (-3.28%)
Volume$6.58K
Capitalization30.97B
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$12.23
Change+$0.11 (+0.91%)
Volume$100
Capitalization116.09B
BCLYF vs MUFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCLYF vs. MUFG commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLYF is a Hold and MUFG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BCLYF: $3.66 vs. MUFG: $12.54)
Brand notoriety: BCLYF and MUFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCLYF: 338% vs. MUFG: 165%
Market capitalization -- BCLYF: $30.97B vs. MUFG: $116.09B
BCLYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $30.97B. MUFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $116.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCLYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMUFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MUFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCLYF is a better buy in the long-term than MUFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MUFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MUFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BCLYF (@Major Banks) experienced а +14.91% price change this week, while MUFG (@Major Banks) price change was +6.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

MUFG is expected to report earnings on May 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.26% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUFG($116B) has a higher market cap than BCLYF($31B). MUFG has higher P/E ratio than BCLYF: MUFG (8.85) vs BCLYF (4.22). BCLYF YTD gains are higher at: 10.574 vs. MUFG (6.997). BCLYF has less debt than MUFG: BCLYF (116B) vs MUFG (48.64T). MUFG has higher revenues than BCLYF: MUFG (5.66T) vs BCLYF (25.3B).
BCLYFMUFGBCLYF / MUFG
Capitalization31B116B27%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.5746.997151%
P/E Ratio4.228.8548%
Revenue25.3B5.66T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt116B48.64T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCLYF vs MUFG: Fundamental Ratings
BCLYF
MUFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5570
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
365
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1717
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCLYF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MUFG (65) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (36) in the null industry. This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (4) in the null industry. This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCLYF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MUFG (43) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

BCLYF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as MUFG (17) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MUFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCLYF and MUFG have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCLYF and MUFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
+5.17%
MUFG - BCLYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.07%
SMFG - BCLYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
BCS - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.49%
BACHF - BCLYF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.14%
BBVXF - BCLYF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+4.07%
SMFG - MUFG
88%
Closely correlated
+1.97%
C - MUFG
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
WFC - MUFG
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
BAC - MUFG
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
BMO - MUFG
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
More