BCLYF
Price
$3.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
BCS
Price
$13.13
Change
+$0.16 (+1.23%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:09 PM (EDT)
90 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BCLYF vs BCS

Header iconBCLYF vs BCS Comparison
Open Charts BCLYF vs BCSBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$3.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.58K
CapitalizationN/A
Barclays
Price$13.13
Change+$0.16 (+1.23%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
BCLYF vs BCS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCLYF vs. BCS commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLYF is a Hold and BCS is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (BCLYF: $3.21 vs. BCS: $12.96)
Brand notoriety: BCLYF: Not notable vs. BCS: Notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCLYF: 21% vs. BCS: 100%
Market capitalization -- BCLYF: $30.97B vs. BCS: $34.89B
BCLYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $30.97B. BCS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $34.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCLYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBCS’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BCS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BCLYF and BCS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BCLYF (@Major Banks) experienced а -1.38% price change this week, while BCS (@Major Banks) price change was -2.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCS is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.54% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCS($34.9B) has a higher market cap than BCLYF($31B). BCS has higher P/E ratio than BCLYF: BCS (6.84) vs BCLYF (4.22). BCS YTD gains are higher at: 70.756 vs. BCLYF (64.954). BCLYF has less debt than BCS: BCLYF (116B) vs BCS (177B). BCS (25.4B) and BCLYF (25.3B) have equivalent revenues.
BCLYFBCSBCLYF / BCS
Capitalization31B34.9B89%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD64.95470.75692%
P/E Ratio4.226.8462%
Revenue25.3B25.4B100%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt116B177B66%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCLYF vs BCS: Fundamental Ratings
BCLYF
BCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2374
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3933
SMR RATING
1..100
44
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
379
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8545

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCLYF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (11) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (39) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's SMR Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (4) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (40) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (37) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCLYF and MUFG have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCLYF and MUFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
-2.43%
MUFG - BCLYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.96%
SMFG - BCLYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.88%
BCS - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
BACHF - BCLYF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.43%
BBVXF - BCLYF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCS has been loosely correlated with SCBFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCS jumps, then SCBFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCS
1D Price
Change %
BCS100%
-1.89%
SCBFY - BCS
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
SAN - BCS
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
RY - BCS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
ING - BCS
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
HSBC - BCS
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
More