BCLYF
Price
$6.71
Change
+$1.66 (+32.87%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
94.23B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BCS
Price
$26.46
Change
-$1.06 (-3.85%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:25 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
94.23B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCLYF vs BCS

Header iconBCLYF vs BCS Comparison
Open Charts BCLYF vs BCSBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$6.71
Change+$1.66 (+32.87%)
Volume$16.13K
Capitalization94.23B
Barclays
Price$26.46
Change-$1.06 (-3.85%)
Volume$3.87K
Capitalization94.23B
BCLYF vs BCS Comparison Chart in %
BCLYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCLYF vs. BCS commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLYF is a Hold and BCS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (BCLYF: $6.71 vs. BCS: $27.52)
Brand notoriety: BCLYF: Not notable vs. BCS: Notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCLYF: 27% vs. BCS: 141%
Market capitalization -- BCLYF: $94.23B vs. BCS: $94.23B
BCLYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $94.23B. BCS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $94.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $848.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $146.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCLYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBCS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BCS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BCLYF and BCS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCLYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCLYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCS is a better buy in the short-term than BCLYF.

Price Growth

BCLYF (@Major Banks) experienced а +6.42% price change this week, while BCS (@Major Banks) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCS is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.93% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLYF($94.2B) and BCS($94.2B) have the same market capitalization . BCS (12.39) and BCLYF (12.09) have similar P/E ratio . BCS YTD gains are higher at: 8.134 vs. BCLYF (5.503). BCLYF (122B) and BCS (122B) have identical debt. BCLYF (28.5B) and BCS (28.5B) have equivalent revenues.
BCLYFBCSBCLYF / BCS
Capitalization94.2B94.2B100%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.5038.13468%
P/E Ratio12.0912.3998%
Revenue28.5B28.5B100%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt122B122B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCLYF vs BCS: Fundamental Ratings
BCLYF
BCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9221
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
116
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3732
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCLYF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (69) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (11) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's SMR Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (5) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCLYF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (40) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (37) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCLYFBCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCLYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EAF16.631.50
+9.91%
GrafTech International Ltd
DRS41.511.06
+2.62%
Leonardo DRS
FITBP24.55-0.06
-0.26%
Fifth Third Bancorp
STRC98.46-0.60
-0.60%
MicroStrategy Inc
QFIN15.07-0.46
-2.96%
Qfin Holdings Inc

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCLYF has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCLYF jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
-2.33%
BCS - BCLYF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
SAN - BCLYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.36%
ING - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
AAVMY - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
WFC - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
More

BCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCS has been closely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCS jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCS
1D Price
Change %
BCS100%
+0.04%
NWG - BCS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
HSBC - BCS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
WFC - BCS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
SAN - BCS
64%
Loosely correlated
-6.36%
C - BCS
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
More