Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCLPX vs HMECX
BCLPX vs HMECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCLPX vs. HMECX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLPX is a Buy and HMECX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.86B vs. HMECX (1.14B). HMECX pays higher dividends than BCLPX: HMECX (4.31) vs BCLPX (3.50). BCLPX was incepted earlier than HMECX: BCLPX (18 years) vs HMECX (9 years). HMECX (3.39) is less costly to investors than BCLPX (2.37). HMECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 556.00 vs. BCLPX (32.00). BCLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMECX: BCLPX (1000) vs HMECX (2500). BCLPX (4.54) and HMECX (4.53) have marching annual gain over last year. HMECX return over 5 years is better than : 12.41 vs. BCLPX (10.27).
| BCLPX | HMECX | BCLPX / HMECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 3.14 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.37 | 3.39 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.659 | 3.114 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.86B | 1.14B | 427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.50 | 4.31 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.54 | 4.53 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.56 | 12.60 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.27 | 12.41 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement