Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCLPX vs HMECX
BCLPX vs HMECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCLPX vs. HMECX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLPX is a Hold and HMECX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.88B vs. HMECX (1.16B). HMECX pays higher dividends than BCLPX: HMECX (4.31) vs BCLPX (3.49). BCLPX was incepted earlier than HMECX: BCLPX (18 years) vs HMECX (9 years). HMECX (3.39) is less costly to investors than BCLPX (2.36). HMECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 406.00 vs. BCLPX (81.00). BCLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMECX: BCLPX (1000) vs HMECX (2500). HMECX (4.58) and BCLPX (4.42) have marching annual gain over last year. HMECX return over 5 years is better than : 12.89 vs. BCLPX (9.47).
| BCLPX | HMECX | BCLPX / HMECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 3.14 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 3.39 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.906 | 4.282 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.88B | 1.16B | 422% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 4.31 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.42 | 4.58 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.13 | 13.60 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.47 | 12.89 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement