Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCLPX vs HMECX
BCLPX vs HMECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCLPX vs. HMECX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLPX is a Hold and HMECX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.73B vs. HMECX (1.21B). HMECX pays higher dividends than BCLPX: HMECX (4.27) vs BCLPX (3.47). BCLPX was incepted earlier than HMECX: BCLPX (18 years) vs HMECX (9 years). HMECX (3.10) is less costly to investors than BCLPX (2.36). HMECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 406.00 vs. BCLPX (81.00). BCLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMECX: BCLPX (1000) vs HMECX (2500). BCLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.15 vs. HMECX (4.39). HMECX return over 5 years is better than : 17.05 vs. BCLPX (7.14).
| BCLPX | HMECX | BCLPX / HMECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 2.90 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 3.10 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.154 | 4.172 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.73B | 1.21B | 392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.47 | 4.27 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.15 | 4.39 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.74 | 12.67 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.14 | 17.05 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement