Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCLPX vs HMECX
BCLPX vs HMECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCLPX vs. HMECX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLPX is a Buy and HMECX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.88B vs. HMECX (1.13B). HMECX pays higher dividends than BCLPX: HMECX (4.29) vs BCLPX (3.48). BCLPX was incepted earlier than HMECX: BCLPX (18 years) vs HMECX (9 years). HMECX (3.39) is less costly to investors than BCLPX (2.37). HMECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 556.00 vs. BCLPX (81.00). BCLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMECX: BCLPX (1000) vs HMECX (2500). BCLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.54 vs. HMECX (4.75). HMECX return over 5 years is better than : 12.42 vs. BCLPX (10.80).
| BCLPX | HMECX | BCLPX / HMECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 3.14 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.37 | 3.39 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.906 | 3.386 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.88B | 1.13B | 433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 4.29 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.54 | 4.75 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.68 | 12.55 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.80 | 12.42 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement