Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCLPX vs HHCZX
BCLPX vs HHCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCLPX vs. HHCZX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLPX is a Buy and HHCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.85B vs. HHCZX (87.9M). BCLPX pays higher dividends than HHCZX: BCLPX (3.50) vs HHCZX (0.54). BCLPX was incepted earlier than HHCZX: BCLPX (18 years) vs HHCZX (17 years). HHCZX (3.07) is less costly to investors than BCLPX (2.37). HHCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. BCLPX (32.00). BCLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHCZX: BCLPX (1000) vs HHCZX (2500). HHCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.53 vs. BCLPX (4.79). BCLPX return over 5 years is better than : 10.40 vs. HHCZX (4.43).
| BCLPX | HHCZX | BCLPX / HHCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 2.38 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.37 | 3.07 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.783 | 4.324 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.85B | 87.9M | 5,515% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.50 | 0.54 | 650% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.79 | 6.53 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.04 | 17.86 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.40 | 4.43 | 235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.50 | 5.83 | 180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers