Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCLPX vs HHCAX
BCLPX vs HHCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCLPX vs. HHCAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLPX is a Hold and HHCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.86B vs. HHCAX (85.8M). BCLPX pays higher dividends than HHCAX: BCLPX (3.48) vs HHCAX (0.22). BCLPX was incepted earlier than HHCAX: BCLPX (18 years) vs HHCAX (17 years). HHCAX (3.42) is less costly to investors than BCLPX (2.37). HHCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. BCLPX (81.00). BCLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHCAX: BCLPX (1000) vs HHCAX (2500). HHCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.77 vs. BCLPX (4.18). BCLPX return over 5 years is better than : 10.42 vs. HHCAX (3.82).
| BCLPX | HHCAX | BCLPX / HHCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.28 | 2.73 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.37 | 3.42 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.412 | 3.654 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.86B | 85.8M | 5,669% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 0.22 | 1,549% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.18 | 4.77 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.15 | 17.33 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.42 | 3.82 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.44 | 11.66 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement