Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCLPX vs EMACX
BCLPX vs EMACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCLPX vs. EMACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLPX is a Hold and EMACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.76B vs. EMACX (52.7M). BCLPX pays higher dividends than EMACX: BCLPX (3.49) vs EMACX (0.00). BCLPX was incepted earlier than EMACX: BCLPX (18 years) vs EMACX (25 years). EMACX (2.62) is less costly to investors than BCLPX (2.36). EMACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 125.00 vs. BCLPX (81.00). BCLPX (1000) and EMACX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EMACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.36 vs. BCLPX (5.28). EMACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.28 vs. BCLPX (8.16).
| BCLPX | EMACX | BCLPX / EMACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 2.62 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 2.62 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.030 | 15.063 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.76B | 52.7M | 9,023% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.28 | 10.36 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.86 | 22.50 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.16 | 13.28 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.95 | 20.88 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement