BCKIY
Price
$14.43
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
7.21B
CCOHF
Price
$1.57
Change
-$0.25 (-13.74%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.75B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCKIY vs CCOHF

Header iconBCKIY vs CCOHF Comparison
Open Charts BCKIY vs CCOHFBanner chart's image
Babcock International Group
Price$14.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.29K
Capitalization7.21B
China State Construction International Holdings
Price$1.57
Change-$0.25 (-13.74%)
Volume$14K
Capitalization7.75B
BCKIY vs CCOHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCKIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCOHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCKIY vs. CCOHF commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCKIY is a Hold and CCOHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (BCKIY: $14.43 vs. CCOHF: $1.57)
Brand notoriety: BCKIY and CCOHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCKIY: 51% vs. CCOHF: 211%
Market capitalization -- BCKIY: $7.21B vs. CCOHF: $7.75B
BCKIY [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $7.21B. CCOHF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $7.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCKIY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCCOHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCKIY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CCOHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCKIY is a better buy in the long-term than CCOHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCKIY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCOHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCKIY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CCOHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCKIY is a better buy in the short-term than CCOHF.

Price Growth

BCKIY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -2.86% price change this week, while CCOHF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +276.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.01% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCOHF($7.75B) has a higher market cap than BCKIY($7.21B). BCKIY has higher P/E ratio than CCOHF: BCKIY (22.41) vs CCOHF (6.63). BCKIY YTD gains are higher at: 135.703 vs. CCOHF (4.667).
BCKIYCCOHFBCKIY / CCOHF
Capitalization7.21B7.75B93%
EBITDA429MN/A-
Gain YTD135.7034.6672,908%
P/E Ratio22.416.63338%
Revenue4.62BN/A-
Total Cash619MN/A-
Total Debt993MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCKIY vs CCOHF: Fundamental Ratings
BCKIY
CCOHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4633
SMR RATING
1..100
2762
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCOHF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCKIY (72). This means that CCOHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCKIY’s over the last 12 months.

CCOHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as BCKIY (46). This means that CCOHF’s stock grew similarly to BCKIY’s over the last 12 months.

BCKIY's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCOHF (62). This means that BCKIY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

BCKIY's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOHF (51). This means that BCKIY’s stock grew similarly to CCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

BCKIY's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOHF (100). This means that BCKIY’s stock grew similarly to CCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCKIYCCOHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCKIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCOHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMLP49.110.50
+1.03%
Alerian MLP ETF
MOO73.140.15
+0.21%
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
RSPM33.710.05
+0.15%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Matrls ETF
DVND33.79N/A
N/A
Touchstone Dividend Select ETF
NHYM23.68-0.09
-0.40%
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF

BCKIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCKIY and BIRDF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCKIY and BIRDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCKIY
1D Price
Change %
BCKIY100%
-0.03%
BIRDF - BCKIY
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
BCKIF - BCKIY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BFLBY - BCKIY
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
BOUYY - BCKIY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
CCOHF - BCKIY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CCOHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOHF and BFLBY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOHF and BFLBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOHF
1D Price
Change %
CCOHF100%
N/A
BFLBY - CCOHF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
BCKIY - CCOHF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
BIRDF - CCOHF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
BOUYY - CCOHF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
CHYCY - CCOHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More