Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCIL vs CGXU
BCIL vs CGXU Comparison
Open Charts BCIL vs CGXU
Bancreek International Large Cap ETF
Price$28.82
Change+$0.20 (+0.70%)
Volume$9.3K
Net Assets48.78M
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$30.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.33%)
Volume$442.25K
Net Assets4.22B
BCIL vs CGXU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCIL vs. CGXU commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCIL is a StrongBuy and CGXU is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 4.22B vs. BCIL (48.8M). CGXU has a higher annual dividend yield than BCIL: CGXU (23.338) vs BCIL (15.499). BCIL was incepted earlier than CGXU: BCIL (2 years) vs CGXU (4 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than BCIL (0.80). BCIL has a higher turnover CGXU (53.00) vs CGXU (53.00).
| BCIL | CGXU | BCIL / CGXU | |
| Gain YTD | 15.499 | 23.338 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 48.8M | 4.22B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.54 | 148% |
| Turnover | 326.00 | 53.00 | 615% |
| Yield | 1.26 | 1.32 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BCIL | CGXU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 74% | 9 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BCIL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BCIL and III have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCIL and III's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCIL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCIL | 100% | +0.71% | ||
| III - BCIL | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| AZN - BCIL | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
| CAR - BCIL | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| DTE - BCIL | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
| MC - BCIL | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
More | ||||
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 75% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| SAN - CGXU | 69% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| SAP - CGXU | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
More | ||||