BCIC
Price
$12.98
Change
-$0.01 (-0.08%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
169.79M
91 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PFLT
Price
$9.41
Change
+$0.24 (+2.62%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
933.64M
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCIC vs PFLT

Header iconBCIC vs PFLT Comparison
Open Charts BCIC vs PFLTBanner chart's image
BCP Investment
Price$12.98
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
Volume$75.53K
Capitalization169.79M
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
Price$9.41
Change+$0.24 (+2.62%)
Volume$804.26K
Capitalization933.64M
BCIC vs PFLT Comparison Chart in %
BCIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFLT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCIC vs. PFLT commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCIC is a StrongBuy and PFLT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BCIC: $13.01 vs. PFLT: $9.18)
Brand notoriety: BCIC and PFLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCIC: 61% vs. PFLT: 24%
Market capitalization -- BCIC: $169.79M vs. PFLT: $933.64M
BCIC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $169.79M. PFLT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $933.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $167.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCIC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFLT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFLT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFLT is a better buy in the long-term than BCIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCIC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFLT’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCIC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PFLT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFLT is a better buy in the short-term than BCIC.

Price Growth

BCIC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.31% price change this week, while PFLT (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCIC is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.

PFLT is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.24% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFLT($934M) has a higher market cap than BCIC($170M). PFLT has higher P/E ratio than BCIC: PFLT (13.07) vs BCIC (8.32). PFLT YTD gains are higher at: -7.234 vs. BCIC (-20.379). PFLT has higher revenues than BCIC: PFLT (89.9M) vs BCIC (-2.85M).
BCICPFLTBCIC / PFLT
Capitalization170M934M18%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-20.379-7.234282%
P/E Ratio8.3213.0764%
Revenue-2.85M89.9M-3%
Total CashN/A63.5M-
Total DebtN/A1.39B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCIC vs PFLT: Fundamental Ratings
BCIC
PFLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5231
SMR RATING
1..100
9141
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5073
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3914
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCIC's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as PFLT (5). This means that BCIC’s stock grew similarly to PFLT’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as BCIC (52). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to BCIC’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCIC (91). This means that PFLT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCIC’s over the last 12 months.

BCIC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as PFLT (73). This means that BCIC’s stock grew similarly to PFLT’s over the last 12 months.

PFLT's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as BCIC (39). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to BCIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCICPFLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
31%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFLT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVNLY6.94N/A
N/A
Svenska Handelsbanken AB PUBL
CAOEF16.96N/A
N/A
Canon Electronics, Inc.
KGBLY40.10N/A
N/A
Kingboard Laminates Holdings Ltd.
MBOF38.50N/A
N/A
Marine Bancorp of Florida, Inc.
PRRSF0.05N/A
N/A
Prospect Ridge Resources Corp.

BCIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCIC has been loosely correlated with PFLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCIC jumps, then PFLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCIC
1D Price
Change %
BCIC100%
+0.08%
PFLT - BCIC
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
MFIC - BCIC
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
CSWC - BCIC
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
BBDC - BCIC
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
RWAY - BCIC
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
More

PFLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFLT has been closely correlated with GBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFLT jumps, then GBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFLT
1D Price
Change %
PFLT100%
+0.82%
GBDC - PFLT
81%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
BCSF - PFLT
80%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
CSWC - PFLT
79%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
MFIC - PFLT
79%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
ARCC - PFLT
78%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
More