BCH
Price
$30.42
Change
+$0.66 (+2.22%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
15.29B
51 days until earnings call
WF
Price
$52.91
Change
-$0.32 (-0.60%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.79B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCH vs WF

Header iconBCH vs WF Comparison
Open Charts BCH vs WFBanner chart's image
Banco de ChileAmerican
Price$30.42
Change+$0.66 (+2.22%)
Volume$1.06M
Capitalization15.29B
Woori Financial Group
Price$52.91
Change-$0.32 (-0.60%)
Volume$59.36K
Capitalization12.79B
BCH vs WF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCH vs. WF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCH is a StrongBuy and WF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BCH: $30.42 vs. WF: $52.91)
Brand notoriety: BCH and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCH: 328% vs. WF: 91%
Market capitalization -- BCH: $15.29B vs. WF: $12.79B
BCH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $15.29B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $12.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the long-term than BCH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCH is a better buy in the short-term than WF.

Price Growth

BCH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.88% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCH is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

WF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCH($15.3B) has a higher market cap than WF($12.8B). BCH has higher P/E ratio than WF: BCH (11.83) vs WF (6.64). WF YTD gains are higher at: 72.648 vs. BCH (45.086).
BCHWFBCH / WF
Capitalization15.3B12.8B120%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD45.08672.64862%
P/E Ratio11.836.64178%
Revenue3.02TN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt12.82TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCH vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
BCH
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3257
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1114
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1919
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WF's Valuation (61) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCH (89) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to BCH’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WF (14) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WF (1) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCH (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to BCH’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCH (19) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to BCH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCHWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XITK188.012.24
+1.21%
SPDR® FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
IBHG22.450.01
+0.02%
iShares® iBonds® 2027 Term HY & Inc ETF
INDF31.25N/A
N/A
Range India Financials ETF
KHPI25.47-0.07
-0.27%
Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF
XOP129.64-2.61
-1.97%
SPDR® S&P Oil & Gas Explor & Prodtn ETF

BCH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCH has been closely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCH jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCH
1D Price
Change %
BCH100%
+2.22%
BSAC - BCH
79%
Closely correlated
+2.52%
CIB - BCH
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
LYG - BCH
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
IFS - BCH
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
BSBR - BCH
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.82%
More

WF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WF
1D Price
Change %
WF100%
-0.60%
SHG - WF
78%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
KB - WF
73%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
BSAC - WF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.52%
BCH - WF
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
DB - WF
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
More