BCH
Price
$41.22
Change
+$0.37 (+0.91%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
20.66B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PNFPP
Price
$25.02
Change
-$0.08 (-0.32%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCH vs PNFPP

Header iconBCH vs PNFPP Comparison
Open Charts BCH vs PNFPPBanner chart's image
Banco de ChileAmerican
Price$41.22
Change+$0.37 (+0.91%)
Volume$297.14K
Capitalization20.66B
Pinnacle Financial Partners
Price$25.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.32%)
Volume$15.75K
CapitalizationN/A
BCH vs PNFPP Comparison Chart in %
BCH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PNFPP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCH vs. PNFPP commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCH is a Hold and PNFPP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (BCH: $41.22 vs. PNFPP: $25.02)
Brand notoriety: BCH and PNFPP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCH: 121% vs. PNFPP: 152%
Market capitalization -- BCH: $20.66B vs. PNFPP: $0
BCH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $20.66B. PNFPP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePNFPP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PNFPP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCH is a better buy in the long-term than PNFPP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNFPP’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PNFPP’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCH is a better buy in the short-term than PNFPP.

Price Growth

BCH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.54% price change this week, while PNFPP (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCH is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCH YTD gains are higher at: 8.474 vs. PNFPP (0.000). PNFPP has less debt than BCH: PNFPP (2.2B) vs BCH (14.04T). BCH has higher revenues than PNFPP: BCH (3.03T) vs PNFPP (1.74B).
BCHPNFPPBCH / PNFPP
Capitalization20.7BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.4740.000-
P/E Ratio14.55N/A-
Revenue3.03T1.74B174,353%
Total CashN/A339M-
Total Debt14.04T2.2B637,131%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCH: Fundamental Ratings
BCH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
72
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCHPNFPP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
23%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PNFPP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BUCK23.780.01
+0.04%
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
FILL25.35N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
ICLN17.36-0.19
-1.08%
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
STMZF16.40-0.19
-1.12%
Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust PLC
BIS9.02-0.22
-2.38%
ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotech

BCH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCH has been closely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCH jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCH
1D Price
Change %
BCH100%
+0.91%
BSAC - BCH
82%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
CIB - BCH
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
BSBR - BCH
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
BBD - BCH
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.07%
BAP - BCH
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
More

PNFPP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFPP has been loosely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PNFPP jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNFPP
1D Price
Change %
PNFPP100%
N/A
WAL - PNFPP
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
FHN - PNFPP
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
BCH - PNFPP
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
NRIM - PNFPP
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
ZION - PNFPP
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
More