BCH
Price
$27.64
Change
-$0.46 (-1.64%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
11.23B
2 days until earnings call
IFS
Price
$36.35
Change
-$0.50 (-1.36%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.77B
15 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCH vs IFS

Header iconBCH vs IFS Comparison
Open Charts BCH vs IFSBanner chart's image
Banco de ChileAmerican
Price$27.64
Change-$0.46 (-1.64%)
Volume$201.87K
Capitalization11.23B
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$36.35
Change-$0.50 (-1.36%)
Volume$181.9K
Capitalization2.77B
BCH vs IFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCH vs. IFS commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCH is a Hold and IFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BCH: $27.64 vs. IFS: $36.35)
Brand notoriety: BCH and IFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCH: 61% vs. IFS: 81%
Market capitalization -- BCH: $11.23B vs. IFS: $2.77B
BCH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.23B. IFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the long-term than BCH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCH is a better buy in the short-term than IFS.

Price Growth

BCH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.68% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCH is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

IFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCH($11.2B) has a higher market cap than IFS($2.77B). IFS has higher P/E ratio than BCH: IFS (9.76) vs BCH (8.77). BCH YTD gains are higher at: 31.827 vs. IFS (27.862). BCH has higher revenues than IFS: BCH (2.94T) vs IFS (6.82B).
BCHIFSBCH / IFS
Capitalization11.2B2.77B404%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD31.82727.862114%
P/E Ratio8.779.7690%
Revenue2.94T6.82B43,046%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A10.4B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCH vs IFS: Fundamental Ratings
BCH
IFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5560
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1537
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2443
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFS's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as BCH (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BCH’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (37) in the null industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (7) in the null industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BCH (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BCH’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (43) in the null industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCHIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EQWL112.200.22
+0.20%
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
DUKH24.36N/A
N/A
Ocean Park High Income ETF
GMUN49.23N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
BSSX24.70N/A
-0.02%
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Muncpl Bd ETF
TZA10.54-0.10
-0.94%
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X ETF

BCH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCH has been closely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCH jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCH
1D Price
Change %
BCH100%
-1.64%
BSAC - BCH
83%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
CIB - BCH
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
LYG - BCH
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
BSBR - BCH
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
BAP - BCH
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
More

IFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFS
1D Price
Change %
IFS100%
-1.36%
BAP - IFS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
BSAC - IFS
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
BCH - IFS
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
BWB - IFS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
WNEB - IFS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
More