BCH
Price
$30.20
Change
+$0.07 (+0.23%)
Updated
Sep 26, 03:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.49B
32 days until earnings call
IFS
Price
$40.01
Change
-$0.13 (-0.32%)
Updated
Sep 26, 03:53 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.53B
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCH vs IFS

Header iconBCH vs IFS Comparison
Open Charts BCH vs IFSBanner chart's image
Banco de ChileAmerican
Price$30.20
Change+$0.07 (+0.23%)
Volume$300
Capitalization15.49B
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$40.01
Change-$0.13 (-0.32%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.53B
BCH vs IFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCH vs. IFS commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCH is a StrongBuy and IFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BCH: $30.13 vs. IFS: $40.14)
Brand notoriety: BCH and IFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCH: 89% vs. IFS: 71%
Market capitalization -- BCH: $15.49B vs. IFS: $4.53B
BCH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $15.49B. IFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IFS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BCH and IFS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCH is a better buy in the short-term than IFS.

Price Growth

BCH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.83% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCH is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

IFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCH($15.5B) has a higher market cap than IFS($4.53B). BCH has higher P/E ratio than IFS: BCH (11.49) vs IFS (8.71). BCH YTD gains are higher at: 43.703 vs. IFS (41.193). IFS has less debt than BCH: IFS (12B) vs BCH (12.82T). BCH has higher revenues than IFS: BCH (3.02T) vs IFS (6.94B).
BCHIFSBCH / IFS
Capitalization15.5B4.53B342%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD43.70341.193106%
P/E Ratio11.498.71132%
Revenue3.02T6.94B43,438%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt12.82T12B106,825%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCH vs IFS: Fundamental Ratings
BCH
IFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2116
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1229
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1778
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFS's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCH (91) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCH’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (29) in the null industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (7) in the null industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BCH (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BCH’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFS (78) in the null industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCHIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESPRX38.81N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Small Cap Value R6
SMXAX19.67N/A
N/A
SEI Extended Market Index A (SIIT)
SBFAX30.23N/A
N/A
1919 Financial Services A
MBERX32.08-0.17
-0.53%
NYLI Balanced Class R6
RIRCX78.36-0.45
-0.57%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R3

BCH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCH has been closely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCH jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCH
1D Price
Change %
BCH100%
-1.60%
BSAC - BCH
79%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
CIB - BCH
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
BSBR - BCH
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.55%
IFS - BCH
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
ITUB - BCH
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
More

IFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFS
1D Price
Change %
IFS100%
-1.06%
BAP - IFS
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
BSAC - IFS
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
BCH - IFS
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
BLX - IFS
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
DB - IFS
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
More