Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEMX vs RNWHX
BCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BCEMX vs RNWHX
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
Price$32.26
Change+$3.13 (+10.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.18M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
BCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. BCEMX (117M). BCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BCEMX (2.02) vs RNWHX (1.25). BCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BCEMX (4 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BCEMX (1.45) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BCEMX (27.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs BCEMX (10000). BCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.79 vs. RNWHX (27.68).
| BCEMX | RNWHX | BCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.72 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.72 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.245 | 6.092 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 1.25 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.79 | 27.68 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.08 | 43.24 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 11.69 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 124.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement