Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEMX vs RNWHX
BCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BCEMX vs RNWHX
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
Price$28.89
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.24M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
BCEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. BCEMX (99.2M). BCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BCEMX (1.80) vs RNWHX (0.93). BCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BCEMX (4 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BCEMX (1.45) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BCEMX (25.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEMX: RNWHX (250) vs BCEMX (10000). BCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.78 vs. RNWHX (15.38).
| BCEMX | RNWHX | BCEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.72 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.72 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.199 | 24.375 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.2M | 74.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.93 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.78 | 15.38 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.06 | 57.29 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 29.08 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement