Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEMX vs RNWAX
BCEMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BCEMX vs RNWAX
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
Price$32.26
Change+$3.13 (+10.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.18M
American Funds New World R1
Price$94.09
Change+$2.64 (+2.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
BCEMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. BCEMX (117M). BCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BCEMX (2.02) vs RNWAX (0.53). BCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BCEMX (4 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BCEMX (1.45). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BCEMX (27.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEMX: RNWAX (250) vs BCEMX (10000). BCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.79 vs. RNWAX (26.30).
| BCEMX | RNWAX | BCEMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.66 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.66 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.245 | 6.005 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.53 | 382% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.79 | 26.30 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.08 | 38.84 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 7.02 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement