Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEMX vs RNWAX
BCEMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BCEMX vs RNWAX
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
Price$29.68
Change+$0.27 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.34M
American Funds New World R1
Price$88.95
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
BCEMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. BCEMX (104M). BCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BCEMX (1.75) vs RNWAX (0.00). BCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BCEMX (4 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BCEMX (1.45). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BCEMX (25.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEMX: RNWAX (250) vs BCEMX (10000). BCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.25 vs. RNWAX (18.60).
| BCEMX | RNWAX | BCEMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.66 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.66 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.560 | 20.535 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 104M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.25 | 18.60 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.53 | 40.76 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 7.55 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement