BCEKF
Price
$0.51
Change
+$0.04 (+8.51%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
138.76M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CDE
Price
$19.19
Change
+$0.47 (+2.51%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
12.32B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCEKF vs CDE

Header iconBCEKF vs CDE Comparison
Open Charts BCEKF vs CDEBanner chart's image
Bear Creek Mining
Price$0.51
Change+$0.04 (+8.51%)
Volume$726.43K
Capitalization138.76M
Coeur Mining
Price$19.19
Change+$0.47 (+2.51%)
Volume$17.47M
Capitalization12.32B
BCEKF vs CDE Comparison Chart in %
BCEKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CDE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCEKF vs. CDE commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCEKF is a Buy and CDE is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BCEKF: $0.51 vs. CDE: $19.19)
Brand notoriety: BCEKF and CDE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCEKF: 83% vs. CDE: 96%
Market capitalization -- BCEKF: $138.76M vs. CDE: $12.32B
BCEKF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $138.76M. CDE’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $12.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $125.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCEKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCDE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCEKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CDE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDE is a better buy in the long-term than BCEKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCEKF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDE’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCEKF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CDE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BCEKF and CDE are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BCEKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +29.55% price change this week, while CDE (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDE is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.32% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDE($12.3B) has a higher market cap than BCEKF($139M). CDE YTD gains are higher at: 235.490 vs. BCEKF (114.503). CDE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 660M vs. BCEKF (-44.03M). CDE has more cash in the bank: 266M vs. BCEKF (2.32M). BCEKF has less debt than CDE: BCEKF (85.3M) vs CDE (377M). CDE has higher revenues than BCEKF: CDE (1.7B) vs BCEKF (98.4M).
BCEKFCDEBCEKF / CDE
Capitalization139M12.3B1%
EBITDA-44.03M660M-7%
Gain YTD114.503235.49049%
P/E RatioN/A27.03-
Revenue98.4M1.7B6%
Total Cash2.32M266M1%
Total Debt85.3M377M23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCEKF vs CDE: Fundamental Ratings
BCEKF
CDE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8472
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10037
SMR RATING
1..100
10047
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9376
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCEKF's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as CDE (77) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.

CDE's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCEKF (100) in the null industry. This means that CDE’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

CDE's SMR Rating (47) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCEKF (100) in the null industry. This means that CDE’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

BCEKF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CDE (36) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.

CDE's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BCEKF (93) in the null industry. This means that CDE’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCEKFCDE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCEKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CDE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SILXY29.330.43
+1.51%
Silex Systems Ltd.
CCYY8.25N/A
N/A
CCCB BANCORP INC.
CSXXY40.01N/A
N/A
CAR GROUP LTD
OMHLF0.17N/A
N/A
OM Holdings Ltd.
BAMXF104.30-3.23
-3.01%
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG

BCEKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCEKF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCEKF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCEKF
1D Price
Change %
BCEKF100%
+7.82%
PAAS - BCEKF
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.90%
AU - BCEKF
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
FNV - BCEKF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
CDE - BCEKF
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
AEM - BCEKF
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
More

CDE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDE has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDE jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDE
1D Price
Change %
CDE100%
+2.51%
PAAS - CDE
75%
Closely correlated
+2.90%
SA - CDE
70%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
IAG - CDE
66%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
NGD - CDE
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.75%
WPM - CDE
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
More