BCEKF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
55.07M
76 days until earnings call
CBGZF
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.01 (-3.33%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
81.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCEKF vs CBGZF

Header iconBCEKF vs CBGZF Comparison
Open Charts BCEKF vs CBGZFBanner chart's image
Bear Creek Mining
Price$0.17
Change-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Volume$248.07K
Capitalization55.07M
Cabral Gold
Price$0.29
Change-$0.01 (-3.33%)
Volume$130.6K
Capitalization81.86M
BCEKF vs CBGZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCEKF vs. CBGZF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCEKF is a Buy and CBGZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BCEKF: $0.17 vs. CBGZF: $0.29)
Brand notoriety: BCEKF and CBGZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCEKF: 93% vs. CBGZF: 71%
Market capitalization -- BCEKF: $50.87M vs. CBGZF: $79.91M
BCEKF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $50.87M. CBGZF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $79.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $89.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCEKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCBGZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCEKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CBGZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBGZF is a better buy in the long-term than BCEKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCEKF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBGZF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCEKF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CBGZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBGZF is a better buy in the short-term than BCEKF.

Price Growth

BCEKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +28.73% price change this week, while CBGZF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4956.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCEKF is expected to report earnings on Nov 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.81% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBGZF($81.9M) has a higher market cap than BCEKF($55.1M). CBGZF YTD gains are higher at: 82.941 vs. BCEKF (-27.336). CBGZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -8.08M vs. BCEKF (-22.06M). BCEKF has more cash in the bank: 6.7M vs. CBGZF (3.53M). BCEKF has higher revenues than CBGZF: BCEKF (99.9M) vs CBGZF (0).
BCEKFCBGZFBCEKF / CBGZF
Capitalization55.1M81.9M67%
EBITDA-22.06M-8.08M273%
Gain YTD-27.33682.941-33%
P/E RatioN/A31.14-
Revenue99.9M0-
Total Cash6.7M3.53M190%
Total Debt72.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCEKF vs CBGZF: Fundamental Ratings
BCEKF
CBGZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2821
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9415
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCEKF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CBGZF (76). This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to CBGZF’s over the last 12 months.

CBGZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as BCEKF (100). This means that CBGZF’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

CBGZF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as BCEKF (99). This means that CBGZF’s stock grew similarly to BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

BCEKF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CBGZF (42). This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to CBGZF’s over the last 12 months.

CBGZF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BCEKF (94). This means that CBGZF’s stock grew significantly faster than BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCEKFCBGZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DNKEY20.490.25
+1.24%
Danske Bank A/S
KLKBY5.29N/A
N/A
Kuala Lumpur Kepong Berhad
RKAGY7.37N/A
N/A
Rhoen Klinikum AG
ZTSTF0.17N/A
N/A
ZTEST Electronics, Inc.
CDOAF5.50N/A
N/A
CDON AB

BCEKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCEKF has been loosely correlated with LGDTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCEKF jumps, then LGDTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCEKF
1D Price
Change %
BCEKF100%
-5.65%
LGDTF - BCEKF
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
TORXF - BCEKF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
DPMLF - BCEKF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
KNTNF - BCEKF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
MAIFF - BCEKF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
More

CBGZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBGZF and ELRRF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBGZF and ELRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBGZF
1D Price
Change %
CBGZF100%
-1.54%
ELRRF - CBGZF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
BCEKF - CBGZF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.65%
VAUCF - CBGZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.34%
PROBF - CBGZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.24%
WDOFF - CBGZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
More