Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEGX vs RMFCX
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BCEGX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income C
Price$21.76
Change+$0.10 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.2B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.41
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCEGX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCEGX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. BCEGX (1.2B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BCEGX: RMFCX (1.27) vs BCEGX (0.41). BCEGX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BCEGX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BCEGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BCEGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.82 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEGX: RMFCX (250) vs BCEGX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.38 vs. BCEGX (-19.34). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.49 vs. BCEGX (15.65).
| BCEGX | RMFCX | BCEGX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.925 | 11.347 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.27 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.34 | 11.38 | -170% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.96 | 30.87 | -48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.65 | 60.49 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.67 | 81.82 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement