Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEGX vs RMFCX
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BCEGX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income C
Price$21.75
Change+$0.19 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.27
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.43B
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCEGX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCEGX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. BCEGX (1.06B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BCEGX: RMFCX (1.24) vs BCEGX (0.40). BCEGX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BCEGX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BCEGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BCEGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.82 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEGX: RMFCX (250) vs BCEGX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. BCEGX (-22.08). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.20 vs. BCEGX (14.94).
| BCEGX | RMFCX | BCEGX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.878 | 13.245 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 110B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.24 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.08 | 6.41 | -344% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.72 | 42.10 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.94 | 63.20 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.74 | 103.62 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement