Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEGX vs RMFCX
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BCEGX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income C
Price$21.82
Change-$0.22 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
BCEGX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCEGX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCEGX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. BCEGX (1.11B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BCEGX: RMFCX (1.24) vs BCEGX (0.40). BCEGX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BCEGX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BCEGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BCEGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.82 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEGX: RMFCX (250) vs BCEGX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. BCEGX (-21.07). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. BCEGX (10.64).
| BCEGX | RMFCX | BCEGX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.91 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.206 | 11.421 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.24 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.07 | 7.71 | -273% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.23 | 32.16 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.64 | 56.41 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.58 | 91.12 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement