BCE
Price
$24.38
Change
-$0.34 (-1.38%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
23.1B
59 days until earnings call
PTTWF
Price
$2.05
Change
+$0.46 (+28.93%)
Updated
Aug 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.29B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCE vs PTTWF

Header iconBCE vs PTTWF Comparison
Open Charts BCE vs PTTWFBanner chart's image
BCE
Price$24.38
Change-$0.34 (-1.38%)
Volume$33.65K
Capitalization23.1B
Orange Polska SA
Price$2.05
Change+$0.46 (+28.93%)
Volume$300
Capitalization3.29B
BCE vs PTTWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCE vs. PTTWF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCE is a Hold and PTTWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BCE: $24.72 vs. PTTWF: $2.05)
Brand notoriety: BCE and PTTWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCE: 74% vs. PTTWF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BCE: $23.1B vs. PTTWF: $3.29B
BCE [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $23.1B. PTTWF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $3.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $284.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePTTWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PTTWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCE is a better buy in the long-term than PTTWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BCE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BCE (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -0.96% price change this week, while PTTWF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCE is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-0.33% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCE($23.1B) has a higher market cap than PTTWF($3.29B). BCE has higher P/E ratio than PTTWF: BCE (74.13) vs PTTWF (13.94). BCE YTD gains are higher at: 6.644 vs. PTTWF (0.000). BCE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.12B vs. PTTWF (4.08B). PTTWF has more cash in the bank: 648M vs. BCE (510M). PTTWF has less debt than BCE: PTTWF (7.44B) vs BCE (37.6B). BCE has higher revenues than PTTWF: BCE (24.4B) vs PTTWF (12.8B).
BCEPTTWFBCE / PTTWF
Capitalization23.1B3.29B702%
EBITDA8.12B4.08B199%
Gain YTD6.6440.000-
P/E Ratio74.1313.94532%
Revenue24.4B12.8B191%
Total Cash510M648M79%
Total Debt37.6B7.44B506%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCE vs PTTWF: Fundamental Ratings
BCE
PTTWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
8979
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5670
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
520
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8553

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCE's Valuation (5) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as PTTWF (14) in the null industry. This means that BCE’s stock grew similarly to PTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

PTTWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as BCE (100) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that PTTWF’s stock grew similarly to BCE’s over the last 12 months.

PTTWF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as BCE (89) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that PTTWF’s stock grew similarly to BCE’s over the last 12 months.

BCE's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as PTTWF (70) in the null industry. This means that BCE’s stock grew similarly to PTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

BCE's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as PTTWF (20) in the null industry. This means that BCE’s stock grew similarly to PTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCEPTTWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
38%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
51%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAISX13.580.12
+0.89%
Nuveen Quant Intl Small Cap Eq I
AFMBX38.010.20
+0.53%
American Funds American Balanced F3
HFLGX12.06N/A
N/A
Hennessy Cornerstone Large Growth Inv
ACSCX10.35-0.03
-0.29%
American Century Small Cap Value A
VBCVX15.87-0.05
-0.31%
VALIC Company I Systematic Value

BCE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCE has been loosely correlated with TU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCE jumps, then TU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCE
1D Price
Change %
BCE100%
+1.02%
TU - BCE
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
RCI - BCE
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
VZ - BCE
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
AMX - BCE
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
CHT - BCE
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
More

PTTWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PTTWF and TLSNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PTTWF and TLSNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PTTWF
1D Price
Change %
PTTWF100%
N/A
TLSNF - PTTWF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCE - PTTWF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
HTWSF - PTTWF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
CUCSF - PTTWF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMGHF - PTTWF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More