It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCHT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BCE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BCE (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +6.69% price change this week, while CHT (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -0.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.36%.
BCE is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
CHT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
BCE | CHT | BCE / CHT | |
Capitalization | 23.7B | 34.9B | 68% |
EBITDA | 8.04B | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 9.448 | 24.176 | 39% |
P/E Ratio | 75.95 | 27.63 | 275% |
Revenue | 24.3B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 1.05B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 39.2B | N/A | - |
BCE | CHT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BCE's Valuation (5) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHT (51). This means that BCE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHT’s over the last 12 months.
CHT's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCE (100). This means that CHT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCE’s over the last 12 months.
CHT's SMR Rating (71) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as BCE (88). This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to BCE’s over the last 12 months.
CHT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as BCE (53). This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to BCE’s over the last 12 months.
BCE's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHT (41). This means that BCE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHT’s over the last 12 months.
BCE | CHT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago39% | 2 days ago16% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago32% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago37% | 2 days ago28% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago40% | 2 days ago18% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago39% | 2 days ago28% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago38% | 8 days ago28% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago51% | 19 days ago26% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago16% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago21% | 2 days ago32% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCE has been loosely correlated with TU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCE jumps, then TU could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHT has been loosely correlated with VOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHT jumps, then VOD could also see price increases.