BCCOY
Price
$0.80
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
259.61M
TPGVF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCCOY vs TPGVF

Header iconBCCOY vs TPGVF Comparison
Open Charts BCCOY vs TPGVFBanner chart's image
BICO GROUP AB
Price$0.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$670
Capitalization259.61M
Top Glove
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$13K
Capitalization1.18B
BCCOY vs TPGVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCCOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCCOY vs. TPGVF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCCOY is a Hold and TPGVF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BCCOY: $0.80 vs. TPGVF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: BCCOY and TPGVF are both not notable
BCCOY represents the Medical/Nursing Services, while TPGVF is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCCOY: 55% vs. TPGVF: 174%
Market capitalization -- BCCOY: $259.61M vs. TPGVF: $1.18B
BCCOY [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $259.61M. TPGVF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $1.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $229.31B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $172.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.55B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $11.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCCOY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTPGVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCCOY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TPGVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TPGVF is a better buy in the long-term than BCCOY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCCOY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPGVF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCCOY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • TPGVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TPGVF is a better buy in the short-term than BCCOY.

Price Growth

BCCOY (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TPGVF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +7.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.22%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+7.68% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+0.19% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TPGVF($1.18B) has a higher market cap than BCCOY($260M). BCCOY YTD gains are higher at: -11.111 vs. TPGVF (-47.384). TPGVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 426M vs. BCCOY (-54.8M). BCCOY has more cash in the bank: 596M vs. TPGVF (528M). TPGVF has less debt than BCCOY: TPGVF (1.01B) vs BCCOY (1.41B). TPGVF has higher revenues than BCCOY: TPGVF (3.43B) vs BCCOY (1.87B).
BCCOYTPGVFBCCOY / TPGVF
Capitalization260M1.18B22%
EBITDA-54.8M426M-13%
Gain YTD-11.111-47.38423%
P/E RatioN/A85.73-
Revenue1.87B3.43B54%
Total Cash596M528M113%
Total Debt1.41B1.01B139%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TPGVF: Fundamental Ratings
TPGVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
45
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCCOYTPGVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCCOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGKPX27.16-0.02
-0.07%
Goldman Sachs Income Builder P
AGVFX26.90-0.02
-0.07%
American Funds Global Insight A
GISTX39.29-0.11
-0.28%
Goldman Sachs Technology Opps Inv
SVUIX39.88-0.14
-0.35%
NAA SMid Cap Value Institutional
HSFNX27.53-0.47
-1.68%
Hennessy Small Cap Financial Investor

BCCOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCCOY has been loosely correlated with AMBFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCCOY jumps, then AMBFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCCOY
1D Price
Change %
BCCOY100%
N/A
AMBFF - BCCOY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TPGVF - BCCOY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCRXF - BCCOY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RXST - BCCOY
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
LDXHF - BCCOY
4%
Poorly correlated
+14.29%
More

TPGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TPGVF and AMBFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TPGVF and AMBFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TPGVF
1D Price
Change %
TPGVF100%
N/A
AMBFF - TPGVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDXH - TPGVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
BCCOY - TPGVF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLLKF - TPGVF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLVY - TPGVF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
More