It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCCOY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCRXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BCCOY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCRXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BCCOY (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +2.39% price change this week, while MCRXF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.73%.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
BCCOY | MCRXF | BCCOY / MCRXF | |
Capitalization | 154M | 35.4M | 435% |
EBITDA | 226M | -8.59M | -2,632% |
Gain YTD | -33.333 | 20.000 | -167% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 1.76B | 11M | 16,018% |
Total Cash | 548M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 1.41B | N/A | - |
BCCOY | MCRXF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago27% | 6 days ago43% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago41% | 3 days ago50% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago44% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago38% | 3 days ago27% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago35% | 3 days ago31% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago54% | 3 days ago32% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago46% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCCOY has been loosely correlated with AMBFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCCOY jumps, then AMBFF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCCOY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BCCOY | 100% | N/A | ||
AMBFF - BCCOY | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
TPGVF - BCCOY | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MCRXF - BCCOY | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
RXST - BCCOY | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
LDXHF - BCCOY | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCRXF and RXST have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCRXF and RXST's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCRXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MCRXF | 100% | N/A | ||
RXST - MCRXF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
PRCT - MCRXF | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.97% | ||
BCCOY - MCRXF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WRBY - MCRXF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
MXCT - MCRXF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |