BCCMY
Price
$2.90
Change
-$0.03 (-1.02%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.16B
LI
Price
$25.94
Change
+$0.51 (+2.01%)
Updated
Sep 25, 03:49 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.76B
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCCMY vs LI

Header iconBCCMY vs LI Comparison
Open Charts BCCMY vs LIBanner chart's image
BAIC MTR
Price$2.90
Change-$0.03 (-1.02%)
Volume$500
Capitalization2.16B
Li Auto
Price$25.94
Change+$0.51 (+2.01%)
Volume$1.42K
Capitalization25.76B
BCCMY vs LI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCCMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCCMY vs. LI commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCCMY is a Hold and LI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BCCMY: $2.90 vs. LI: $25.43)
Brand notoriety: BCCMY and LI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCCMY: 63% vs. LI: 85%
Market capitalization -- BCCMY: $2.16B vs. LI: $25.76B
BCCMY [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $2.16B. LI’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $25.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.47T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $39.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCCMY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCCMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCCMY is a better buy in the long-term than LI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCCMY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCCMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • LI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCCMY is a better buy in the short-term than LI.

Price Growth

BCCMY (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LI (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -4.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

LI is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-1.21% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LI($25.8B) has a higher market cap than BCCMY($2.16B). LI has higher P/E ratio than BCCMY: LI (23.68) vs BCCMY (17.32). LI YTD gains are higher at: 6.003 vs. BCCMY (1.045).
BCCMYLIBCCMY / LI
Capitalization2.16B25.8B8%
EBITDAN/A9.62B-
Gain YTD1.0456.00317%
P/E Ratio17.3223.6873%
RevenueN/A145B-
Total CashN/A107B-
Total DebtN/A16.9B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCCMY: Fundamental Ratings
BCCMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCCMYLI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCCMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSQ31.230.10
+0.32%
ProShares Short QQQ
ZFEB24.90N/A
N/A
Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrFeb
IBB141.64-0.85
-0.60%
iShares Biotechnology ETF
GGZ14.67-0.10
-0.68%
Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value Trust (The)
MEMS26.97-0.27
-0.97%
Matthews Emerging Markets Discv Actv ETF

BCCMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCCMY and AMGDF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCCMY and AMGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCCMY
1D Price
Change %
BCCMY100%
N/A
AMGDF - BCCMY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LI - BCCMY
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
BMCLF - BCCMY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCAUF - BCCMY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBLX - BCCMY
-1%
Poorly correlated
-5.06%
More

LI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LI has been loosely correlated with XPEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LI jumps, then XPEV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LI
1D Price
Change %
LI100%
+1.60%
XPEV - LI
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
NIO - LI
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.74%
ZK - LI
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
NIU - LI
43%
Loosely correlated
+5.69%
PSNY - LI
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
More