BCCMY
Price
$2.57
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
BMCLF
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

BCCMY vs BMCLF

Header iconBCCMY vs BMCLF Comparison
Open Charts BCCMY vs BMCLFBanner chart's image
BAIC MTR
Price$2.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$250
CapitalizationN/A
Baic Mtr
Price$0.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.9K
CapitalizationN/A
BCCMY vs BMCLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCCMY vs. BMCLF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCCMY is a Hold and BMCLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (BCCMY: $2.57 vs. BMCLF: $0.29)
Brand notoriety: BCCMY and BMCLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCCMY: 59% vs. BMCLF: 3%
Market capitalization -- BCCMY: $2.19B vs. BMCLF: $2.22B
BCCMY [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $2.19B. BMCLF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $2.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $33.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCCMY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBMCLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCCMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BMCLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BCCMY and BMCLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BCCMY (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BMCLF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +4.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-0.57% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMCLF($2.22B) and BCCMY($2.19B) have the same market capitalization . BCCMY has higher P/E ratio than BMCLF: BCCMY (5.19) vs BMCLF (3.79). BMCLF YTD gains are higher at: 5.013 vs. BCCMY (3.213). BCCMY (33.2B) and BMCLF (33.2B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . BCCMY (41B) and BMCLF (41B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . BCCMY (22.5B) and BMCLF (22.5B) have identical debt. BCCMY (176B) and BMCLF (176B) have equivalent revenues.
BCCMYBMCLFBCCMY / BMCLF
Capitalization2.19B2.22B99%
EBITDA33.2B33.2B100%
Gain YTD3.2135.01364%
P/E Ratio5.193.79137%
Revenue176B176B100%
Total Cash41B41B100%
Total Debt22.5B22.5B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCCMY vs BMCLF: Fundamental Ratings
BCCMY
BMCLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4298
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7578
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1539
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCCMY's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BMCLF (8). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew similarly to BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.

BCCMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BMCLF (100). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew similarly to BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.

BCCMY's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as BMCLF (78). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew similarly to BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.

BCCMY's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as BMCLF (57). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew similarly to BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.

BCCMY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as BMCLF (39). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew similarly to BMCLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BCCMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCCMY and AMGDF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCCMY and AMGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCCMY
1D Price
Change %
BCCMY100%
N/A
AMGDF - BCCMY
10%
Poorly correlated
-6.66%
LI - BCCMY
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
BMCLF - BCCMY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCAUF - BCCMY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AYRO - BCCMY
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
More

BMCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMCLF and NIU have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMCLF and NIU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMCLF
1D Price
Change %
BMCLF100%
N/A
NIU - BMCLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
GELYY - BMCLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
BYMOF - BMCLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELEK - BMCLF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.85%
LI - BMCLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
More