BCC
Price
$83.89
Change
-$2.83 (-3.26%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
6.07B
14 days until earnings call
SMID
Price
$37.27
Change
-$1.24 (-3.22%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
247.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCC vs SMID

Header iconBCC vs SMID Comparison
Open Charts BCC vs SMIDBanner chart's image
Boise Cascade
Price$83.89
Change-$2.83 (-3.26%)
Volume$461.03K
Capitalization6.07B
Smith-Midland
Price$37.27
Change-$1.24 (-3.22%)
Volume$7.83K
Capitalization247.2M
BCC vs SMID Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCC vs. SMID commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCC is a Hold and SMID is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (BCC: $83.89 vs. SMID: $38.51)
Brand notoriety: BCC and SMID are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCC: 149% vs. SMID: 72%
Market capitalization -- BCC: $6.07B vs. SMID: $247.2M
BCC [@Construction Materials] is valued at $6.07B. SMID’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $247.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMID’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMID is a better buy in the long-term than BCC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMID’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SMID’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMID is a better buy in the short-term than BCC.

Price Growth

BCC (@Construction Materials) experienced а -7.97% price change this week, while SMID (@Construction Materials) price change was +0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCC is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-1.10% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCC($6.07B) has a higher market cap than SMID($247M). SMID has higher P/E ratio than BCC: SMID (427.45) vs BCC (12.62). SMID YTD gains are higher at: -13.383 vs. BCC (-29.111). BCC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 806M vs. SMID (3.43M). BCC has more cash in the bank: 950M vs. SMID (5.85M). SMID has less debt than BCC: SMID (5.94M) vs BCC (530M). BCC has higher revenues than SMID: BCC (6.84B) vs SMID (57.7M).
BCCSMIDBCC / SMID
Capitalization6.07B247M2,457%
EBITDA806M3.43M23,485%
Gain YTD-29.111-13.383218%
P/E Ratio12.62427.453%
Revenue6.84B57.7M11,851%
Total Cash950M5.85M16,242%
Total Debt530M5.94M8,920%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCC vs SMID: Fundamental Ratings
BCC
SMID
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1349
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4743
SMR RATING
1..100
5650
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5599
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCC's Valuation (16) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (70) in the null industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BCC (47) in the Forest Products industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BCC (56) in the Forest Products industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCC (84) in the Forest Products industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCC’s over the last 12 months.

BCC's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (99) in the null industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCCSMID
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMYPX17.36-0.01
-0.06%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value P
RICFX64.01-0.05
-0.08%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R5
FISEX33.63-0.08
-0.24%
Franklin Equity Income A
OSVCX16.79-0.09
-0.53%
JPMorgan Small Cap Value C
EKGIX39.87-0.24
-0.60%
Allspring Special Global Small Cap Inst

BCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCC has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCC jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCC
1D Price
Change %
BCC100%
-3.26%
EXP - BCC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
CRH - BCC
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
KNF - BCC
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
MLM - BCC
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.42%
SMID - BCC
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

SMID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMID
1D Price
Change %
SMID100%
N/A
BCC - SMID
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.26%
USLM - SMID
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
EXP - SMID
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
KNF - SMID
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
CRH - SMID
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
More