BCC
Price
$90.02
Change
+$2.79 (+3.20%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.36B
58 days until earnings call
SMID
Price
$41.80
Change
+$0.44 (+1.06%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
221.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCC vs SMID

Header iconBCC vs SMID Comparison
Open Charts BCC vs SMIDBanner chart's image
Boise Cascade
Price$90.02
Change+$2.79 (+3.20%)
Volume$299.63K
Capitalization3.36B
Smith-Midland
Price$41.80
Change+$0.44 (+1.06%)
Volume$6.07K
Capitalization221.73M
BCC vs SMID Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCC vs. SMID commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCC is a StrongBuy and SMID is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BCC: $90.02 vs. SMID: $41.80)
Brand notoriety: BCC and SMID are both not notable
BCC represents the Forest Products, while SMID is part of the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCC: 86% vs. SMID: 58%
Market capitalization -- BCC: $3.36B vs. SMID: $221.73M
BCC [@Forest Products] is valued at $3.36B. SMID’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $221.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $8.15B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $75.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $1.81B. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMID’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMID is a better buy in the long-term than BCC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMID’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMID’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCC is a better buy in the short-term than SMID.

Price Growth

BCC (@Forest Products) experienced а +3.73% price change this week, while SMID (@Construction Materials) price change was -3.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was +0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.47%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (+0.67% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

@Construction Materials (-0.34% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCC($3.36B) has a higher market cap than SMID($222M). SMID has higher P/E ratio than BCC: SMID (18.41) vs BCC (13.20). SMID YTD gains are higher at: -5.983 vs. BCC (-23.738). SMID has less debt than BCC: SMID (4.86M) vs BCC (508M).
BCCSMIDBCC / SMID
Capitalization3.36B222M1,514%
EBITDAN/A18.4M-
Gain YTD-23.738-5.983397%
P/E Ratio13.2018.4172%
RevenueN/A91M-
Total CashN/A7.1M-
Total Debt508M4.86M10,448%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCC vs SMID: Fundamental Ratings
BCC
SMID
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5682
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5243
SMR RATING
1..100
6434
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCC's Valuation (17) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (72) in the null industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BCC (52) in the Forest Products industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BCC (64) in the Forest Products industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BCC (62) in the Forest Products industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.

BCC's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (93) in the null industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCCSMID
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DMZPY5.610.57
+11.20%
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
AMKBF2174.20126.55
+6.18%
A.P. Moeller-Maersk A/S
AKAAF69.00N/A
N/A
Aker AS
BKUH0.02N/A
N/A
Bakhu Holdings, Corp.
IVCAF11.02N/A
N/A
Investcorp AI Acquisition Corp.

BCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCC has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCC jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCC
1D Price
Change %
BCC100%
+3.20%
UFPI - BCC
79%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
SSD - BCC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
EXP - BCC
70%
Closely correlated
+4.14%
CRH - BCC
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
WFG - BCC
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.30%
More

SMID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMID
1D Price
Change %
SMID100%
+1.06%
BCC - SMID
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.20%
USLM - SMID
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
KNF - SMID
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
EXP - SMID
44%
Loosely correlated
+4.14%
CRH - SMID
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
More