BCC
Price
$77.09
Change
+$0.44 (+0.57%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.86B
38 days until earnings call
SMID
Price
$36.29
Change
+$0.20 (+0.55%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
191.44M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCC vs SMID

Header iconBCC vs SMID Comparison
Open Charts BCC vs SMIDBanner chart's image
Boise Cascade
Price$77.09
Change+$0.44 (+0.57%)
Volume$1.87K
Capitalization2.86B
Smith-Midland
Price$36.29
Change+$0.20 (+0.55%)
Volume$160
Capitalization191.44M
BCC vs SMID Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCC vs. SMID commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCC is a Buy and SMID is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BCC: $77.09 vs. SMID: $36.29)
Brand notoriety: BCC and SMID are both not notable
BCC represents the Forest Products, while SMID is part of the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCC: 19% vs. SMID: 24%
Market capitalization -- BCC: $2.86B vs. SMID: $191.44M
BCC [@Forest Products] is valued at $2.86B. SMID’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $191.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $7.19B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $74.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $1.72B. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMID’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMID is a better buy in the long-term than BCC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMID’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SMID’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCC is a better buy in the short-term than SMID.

Price Growth

BCC (@Forest Products) experienced а -2.99% price change this week, while SMID (@Construction Materials) price change was -6.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -1.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.01%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (-1.78% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

@Construction Materials (-0.91% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCC($2.86B) has a higher market cap than SMID($191M). SMID has higher P/E ratio than BCC: SMID (15.90) vs BCC (11.24). SMID YTD gains are higher at: -18.376 vs. BCC (-35.065). BCC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 523M vs. SMID (18.4M). BCC has more cash in the bank: 481M vs. SMID (7.1M). SMID has less debt than BCC: SMID (4.86M) vs BCC (508M). BCC has higher revenues than SMID: BCC (6.56B) vs SMID (91M).
BCCSMIDBCC / SMID
Capitalization2.86B191M1,498%
EBITDA523M18.4M2,842%
Gain YTD-35.065-18.376191%
P/E Ratio11.2415.9071%
Revenue6.56B91M7,207%
Total Cash481M7.1M6,774%
Total Debt508M4.86M10,448%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCC vs SMID: Fundamental Ratings
BCC
SMID
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5164
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6349
SMR RATING
1..100
6434
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5497
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCC's Valuation (16) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (69) in the null industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BCC (63) in the Forest Products industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BCC (64) in the Forest Products industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as BCC (88) in the Forest Products industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.

BCC's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (97) in the null industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCCSMID
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NYWKF1.40N/A
N/A
NTG Clarity Networks Inc.
AAMTF0.20N/A
N/A
Armada Mercantile Ltd.
KRNNF134.15N/A
N/A
Krones AG
LAAOF9.49N/A
N/A
Li Auto Inc.
KWTEF16.88N/A
N/A
KIWETINOHK ENERGY CORP

BCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCC has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCC jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCC
1D Price
Change %
BCC100%
-1.39%
UFPI - BCC
79%
Closely correlated
-1.41%
SSD - BCC
75%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
EXP - BCC
70%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
CRH - BCC
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
WFG - BCC
60%
Loosely correlated
-3.18%
More

SMID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMID
1D Price
Change %
SMID100%
+0.55%
BCC - SMID
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
EXP - SMID
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
USLM - SMID
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
KNF - SMID
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
CRH - SMID
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
More