BCC
Price
$71.03
Change
+$0.19 (+0.27%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.65B
16 days until earnings call
RETO
Price
$1.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.66M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCC vs RETO

Header iconBCC vs RETO Comparison
Open Charts BCC vs RETOBanner chart's image
Boise Cascade
Price$71.03
Change+$0.19 (+0.27%)
Volume$329.15K
Capitalization2.65B
ReTo Eco-Solutions
Price$1.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$41.94K
Capitalization8.66M
BCC vs RETO Comparison Chart in %
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RETO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCC vs. RETO commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCC is a Hold and RETO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BCC: $71.03 vs. RETO: $1.04)
Brand notoriety: BCC and RETO are both not notable
BCC represents the Forest Products, while RETO is part of the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCC: 91% vs. RETO: 33%
Market capitalization -- BCC: $2.65B vs. RETO: $8.66M
BCC [@Forest Products] is valued at $2.65B. RETO’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $8.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $7.25B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $78.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $1.7B. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRETO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RETO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCC is a better buy in the long-term than RETO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RETO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RETO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RETO is a better buy in the short-term than BCC.

Price Growth

BCC (@Forest Products) experienced а -1.78% price change this week, while RETO (@Construction Materials) price change was -2.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.33%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (-1.79% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

@Construction Materials (-0.11% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCC($2.65B) has a higher market cap than RETO($8.66M). BCC has higher P/E ratio than RETO: BCC (10.41) vs RETO (0.39). BCC YTD gains are higher at: -39.826 vs. RETO (-88.317). BCC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 523M vs. RETO (-3.86M). RETO has less debt than BCC: RETO (9.11M) vs BCC (508M). BCC has higher revenues than RETO: BCC (6.56B) vs RETO (3.84M).
BCCRETOBCC / RETO
Capitalization2.65B8.66M30,627%
EBITDA523M-3.86M-13,554%
Gain YTD-39.826-88.31745%
P/E Ratio10.410.392,690%
Revenue6.56B3.84M170,737%
Total Cash481MN/A-
Total Debt508M9.11M5,574%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCC vs RETO: Fundamental Ratings
BCC
RETO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
533
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64100
SMR RATING
1..100
6499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8997
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6099
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCC's Valuation (16) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RETO (73) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RETO’s over the last 12 months.

BCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RETO (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RETO’s over the last 12 months.

BCC's SMR Rating (64) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RETO (99) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RETO’s over the last 12 months.

BCC's Price Growth Rating (89) in the Forest Products industry is in the same range as RETO (97) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew similarly to RETO’s over the last 12 months.

BCC's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RETO (99) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RETO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCCRETO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RETO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEMCX31.940.06
+0.19%
SEI Mid-Cap F (SIMT)
GITIX43.110.07
+0.16%
Goldman Sachs Technology Opps Inst
PMJPX11.40N/A
N/A
PIMCO RAE US Small I-2
PAGDX132.53-0.18
-0.14%
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth A
SCMIX201.75-0.97
-0.48%
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst2

BCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCC has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCC jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCC
1D Price
Change %
BCC100%
+0.27%
UFPI - BCC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
SSD - BCC
74%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
EXP - BCC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
WFG - BCC
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
MLM - BCC
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
More

RETO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RETO and USLM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RETO and USLM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RETO
1D Price
Change %
RETO100%
-0.02%
USLM - RETO
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
BCC - RETO
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
CBUMY - RETO
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAPT - RETO
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.74%
CARCY - RETO
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More