BCC
Price
$77.15
Change
+$0.50 (+0.65%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.88B
36 days until earnings call
LOMA
Price
$7.62
Change
-$0.11 (-1.42%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
977.05M
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCC vs LOMA

Header iconBCC vs LOMA Comparison
Open Charts BCC vs LOMABanner chart's image
Boise Cascade
Price$77.15
Change+$0.50 (+0.65%)
Volume$294.41K
Capitalization2.88B
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
Price$7.62
Change-$0.11 (-1.42%)
Volume$652.17K
Capitalization977.05M
BCC vs LOMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCC vs. LOMA commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCC is a Buy and LOMA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BCC: $77.15 vs. LOMA: $7.62)
Brand notoriety: BCC and LOMA are both not notable
BCC represents the Forest Products, while LOMA is part of the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCC: 80% vs. LOMA: 90%
Market capitalization -- BCC: $2.88B vs. LOMA: $977.05M
BCC [@Forest Products] is valued at $2.88B. LOMA’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $977.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $7.12B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $76.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $1.71B. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LOMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOMA is a better buy in the long-term than BCC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOMA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LOMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LOMA is a better buy in the short-term than BCC.

Price Growth

BCC (@Forest Products) experienced а -2.92% price change this week, while LOMA (@Construction Materials) price change was +5.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -3.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.37%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (-3.41% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

@Construction Materials (-0.60% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCC($2.88B) has a higher market cap than LOMA($977M). LOMA has higher P/E ratio than BCC: LOMA (22.98) vs BCC (11.31). BCC (-34.641) and LOMA (-36.181) have similar YTD gains . LOMA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 164B vs. BCC (523M). LOMA has more cash in the bank: 15.9B vs. BCC (481M). BCC has less debt than LOMA: BCC (508M) vs LOMA (275B). LOMA has higher revenues than BCC: LOMA (667B) vs BCC (6.56B).
BCCLOMABCC / LOMA
Capitalization2.88B977M295%
EBITDA523M164B0%
Gain YTD-34.641-36.18196%
P/E Ratio11.3122.9849%
Revenue6.56B667B1%
Total Cash481M15.9B3%
Total Debt508M275B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCC vs LOMA: Fundamental Ratings
BCC
LOMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5253
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6260
SMR RATING
1..100
6468
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8891
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5413
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BCC (16) in the Forest Products industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BCC (62) in the Forest Products industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.

BCC's SMR Rating (64) in the Forest Products industry is in the same range as LOMA (68) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

BCC's Price Growth Rating (88) in the Forest Products industry is in the same range as LOMA (91) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCC (54) in the Forest Products industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCCLOMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MWMIX34.370.42
+1.24%
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat I
IMOWX26.710.30
+1.14%
Voya MidCap Opportunities W
JNBZX10.370.03
+0.27%
JPMorgan Income Builder R6
TSRMX17.18-0.17
-0.98%
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr R6
EMFIX13.47-0.19
-1.39%
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Instl

BCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCC has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCC jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCC
1D Price
Change %
BCC100%
+0.65%
UFPI - BCC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
SSD - BCC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
EXP - BCC
70%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
WFG - BCC
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
CRH - BCC
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
More

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
-1.42%
CX - LOMA
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
KNF - LOMA
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
CRH - LOMA
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
BCC - LOMA
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
USLM - LOMA
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
More