BCBP
Price
$8.25
Change
+$0.24 (+3.00%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
142.13M
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HFWA
Price
$24.10
Change
+$0.16 (+0.67%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
816.66M
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCBP vs HFWA

Header iconBCBP vs HFWA Comparison
Open Charts BCBP vs HFWABanner chart's image
BCB Ban
Price$8.25
Change+$0.24 (+3.00%)
Volume$80.97K
Capitalization142.13M
Heritage Financial
Price$24.10
Change+$0.16 (+0.67%)
Volume$1.94K
Capitalization816.66M
BCBP vs HFWA Comparison Chart in %
BCBP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HFWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCBP vs. HFWA commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCBP is a StrongBuy and HFWA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BCBP: $8.01 vs. HFWA: $23.94)
Brand notoriety: BCBP and HFWA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCBP: 30% vs. HFWA: 30%
Market capitalization -- BCBP: $138.86M vs. HFWA: $816.66M
BCBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $138.86M. HFWA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $816.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHFWA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HFWA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HFWA is a better buy in the long-term than BCBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFWA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HFWA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCBP is a better buy in the short-term than HFWA.

Price Growth

BCBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.62% price change this week, while HFWA (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCBP is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

HFWA is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFWA($817M) has a higher market cap than BCBP($142M). BCBP has higher P/E ratio than HFWA: BCBP (137.50) vs HFWA (14.58). HFWA YTD gains are higher at: 1.805 vs. BCBP (-27.191). HFWA has more cash in the bank: 90.8M vs. BCBP (11.9M). HFWA has less debt than BCBP: HFWA (285M) vs BCBP (391M). HFWA has higher revenues than BCBP: HFWA (226M) vs BCBP (98.6M).
BCBPHFWABCBP / HFWA
Capitalization142M817M17%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-27.1911.805-1,506%
P/E Ratio137.5014.58943%
Revenue98.6M226M44%
Total Cash11.9M90.8M13%
Total Debt391M285M137%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCBP vs HFWA: Fundamental Ratings
BCBP
HFWA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8971
SMR RATING
1..100
7532
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6153
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
288
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HFWA's Valuation (43) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCBP (98). This means that HFWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCBP’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BCBP (89). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to BCBP’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's SMR Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCBP (75). This means that HFWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCBP’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BCBP (61). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to BCBP’s over the last 12 months.

BCBP's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for HFWA (88). This means that BCBP’s stock grew significantly faster than HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCBPHFWA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCBP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HFWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIIYX24.34N/A
N/A
Invesco EQV International Equity Y
LMGFX75.01N/A
N/A
ClearBridge International Growth FI
BOYAX33.61N/A
N/A
Boyar Value
IGNCX15.79N/A
N/A
Nomura Natural Resources C
IMEGX23.79N/A
N/A
Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq R6

BCBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCBP has been closely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCBP jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCBP
1D Price
Change %
BCBP100%
-0.62%
MCBS - BCBP
69%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
KRNY - BCBP
69%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
PEBO - BCBP
68%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
UBSI - BCBP
67%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
HFWA - BCBP
67%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
More

HFWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFWA has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HFWA jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFWA
1D Price
Change %
HFWA100%
-0.46%
STBA - HFWA
88%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
CVBF - HFWA
88%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
HOPE - HFWA
87%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
TCBK - HFWA
86%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
FCF - HFWA
86%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
More