BCAUF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.05 (-14.29%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.81B
NIO
Price
$3.63
Change
+$0.01 (+0.28%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
9.96B
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCAUF vs NIO

Header iconBCAUF vs NIO Comparison
Open Charts BCAUF vs NIOBanner chart's image
Brilliance China Automotive Holding
Price$0.30
Change-$0.05 (-14.29%)
Volume$25K
Capitalization2.81B
NIO
Price$3.63
Change+$0.01 (+0.28%)
Volume$31.18M
Capitalization9.96B
BCAUF vs NIO Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCAUF vs. NIO commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAUF is a Hold and NIO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BCAUF: $0.30 vs. NIO: $3.67)
Brand notoriety: BCAUF: Not notable vs. NIO: Notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCAUF: 156% vs. NIO: 61%
Market capitalization -- BCAUF: $2.81B vs. NIO: $9.96B
BCAUF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $2.81B. NIO’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $9.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $34.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNIO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NIO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCAUF is a better buy in the long-term than NIO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NIO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NIO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BCAUF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NIO (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -6.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

NIO is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+0.08% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIO($9.96B) has a higher market cap than BCAUF($2.81B). NIO YTD gains are higher at: -15.826 vs. BCAUF (-34.761).
BCAUFNIOBCAUF / NIO
Capitalization2.81B9.96B28%
EBITDAN/A-15.88B-
Gain YTD-34.761-15.826220%
P/E Ratio3.50N/A-
RevenueN/A48.5B-
Total CashN/A27.3B-
Total DebtN/A28.4B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCAUF vs NIO: Fundamental Ratings
BCAUF
NIO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4853
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10098
SMR RATING
1..100
4498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8382
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NIO's Valuation (71) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as BCAUF (72) in the null industry. This means that NIO’s stock grew similarly to BCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

NIO's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as BCAUF (100) in the null industry. This means that NIO’s stock grew similarly to BCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

BCAUF's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIO (98) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that BCAUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIO’s over the last 12 months.

NIO's Price Growth Rating (82) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as BCAUF (83) in the null industry. This means that NIO’s stock grew similarly to BCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

BCAUF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIO (100) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that BCAUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NIO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NIO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

BCAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCAUF and AYRO have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCAUF and AYRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCAUF
1D Price
Change %
BCAUF100%
N/A
AYRO - BCAUF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
AMGDF - BCAUF
5%
Poorly correlated
+10.00%
CENN - BCAUF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.68%
NIO - BCAUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
BCCMY - BCAUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NIO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIO has been closely correlated with XPEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NIO jumps, then XPEV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIO
1D Price
Change %
NIO100%
-0.54%
XPEV - NIO
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
LI - NIO
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
PSNY - NIO
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
LCID - NIO
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
RIVN - NIO
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
More