BCAUF vs NIO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAUF is a Hold and NIO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNIO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BCAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NIO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NIO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- NIO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BCAUF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NIO (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +4.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
NIO is expected to report earnings on Jun 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (-0.93% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
| BCAUF | NIO | BCAUF / NIO | |
| Capitalization | 2.81B | 9.96B | 28% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -15.88B | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 3.50 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 48.5B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 27.3B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 28.4B | - |
BCAUF | NIO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NIO's Valuation (57) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as BCAUF (60) in the null industry. This means that NIO’s stock grew similarly to BCAUF’s over the last 12 months.
NIO's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as BCAUF (100) in the null industry. This means that NIO’s stock grew similarly to BCAUF’s over the last 12 months.
BCAUF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIO (98) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that BCAUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIO’s over the last 12 months.
BCAUF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIO (82) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that BCAUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIO’s over the last 12 months.
BCAUF's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as NIO (100) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that BCAUF’s stock grew similarly to NIO’s over the last 12 months.
| NIO | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% |
BCAUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BCAUF and AYRO have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCAUF and AYRO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCAUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCAUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| AYRO - BCAUF | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
| AMGDF - BCAUF | 5% Poorly correlated | +6.37% | ||
| CENN - BCAUF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
| NIO - BCAUF | 2% Poorly correlated | +4.81% | ||
| BCCMY - BCAUF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
NIO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIO has been closely correlated with XPEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NIO jumps, then XPEV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIO | 100% | +4.81% | ||
| XPEV - NIO | 76% Closely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| LI - NIO | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| NIU - NIO | 46% Loosely correlated | +6.15% | ||
| LCID - NIO | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| RIVN - NIO | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
More | ||||