BCAUF
Price
$0.41
Change
-$0.04 (-8.89%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.81B
BCCMY
Price
$2.48
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.19B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCAUF vs BCCMY

Header iconBCAUF vs BCCMY Comparison
Open Charts BCAUF vs BCCMYBanner chart's image
Brilliance China Automotive Holding
Price$0.41
Change-$0.04 (-8.89%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.81B
BAIC MTR
Price$2.48
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.35K
Capitalization2.19B
BCAUF vs BCCMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCCMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCAUF vs. BCCMY commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAUF is a Hold and BCCMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BCAUF: $0.41 vs. BCCMY: $2.47)
Brand notoriety: BCAUF and BCCMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCAUF: 9% vs. BCCMY: 90%
Market capitalization -- BCAUF: $2.81B vs. BCCMY: $2.19B
BCAUF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $2.81B. BCCMY’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $2.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $35.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBCCMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BCCMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BCAUF and BCCMY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCAUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCCMY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCAUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BCCMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCCMY is a better buy in the short-term than BCAUF.

Price Growth

BCAUF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +34.96% price change this week, while BCCMY (@Motor Vehicles) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+0.83% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCAUF($2.81B) has a higher market cap than BCCMY($2.19B). BCCMY has higher P/E ratio than BCAUF: BCCMY (5.19) vs BCAUF (3.50). BCAUF YTD gains are higher at: -11.957 vs. BCCMY (-13.763).
BCAUFBCCMYBCAUF / BCCMY
Capitalization2.81B2.19B128%
EBITDAN/A33.2B-
Gain YTD-11.957-13.76387%
P/E Ratio3.505.1967%
RevenueN/A176B-
Total CashN/A41B-
Total DebtN/A22.5B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCAUF vs BCCMY: Fundamental Ratings
BCAUF
BCCMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4572
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4676
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
684
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCCMY's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BCAUF (75). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew significantly faster than BCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

BCCMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BCAUF (100). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew similarly to BCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

BCAUF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BCCMY (72). This means that BCAUF’s stock grew similarly to BCCMY’s over the last 12 months.

BCAUF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BCCMY (76). This means that BCAUF’s stock grew similarly to BCCMY’s over the last 12 months.

BCCMY's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCAUF (68). This means that BCCMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCAUFBCCMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCCMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMCCX30.040.22
+0.74%
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
FSKAX169.410.82
+0.49%
Fidelity Total Market Index
NARCX64.780.26
+0.40%
Voya Multi-Manager International Sm Cp C
ACSMX11.140.02
+0.18%
Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap
FDEGX74.28-0.01
-0.01%
Fidelity Growth Strategies

BCAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCAUF and AYRO have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCAUF and AYRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCAUF
1D Price
Change %
BCAUF100%
-10.00%
AYRO - BCAUF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
AMGDF - BCAUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CENN - BCAUF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.84%
NIO - BCAUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
BCCMY - BCAUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BCCMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCCMY and AMGDF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCCMY and AMGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCCMY
1D Price
Change %
BCCMY100%
N/A
AMGDF - BCCMY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LI - BCCMY
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
BMCLF - BCCMY
5%
Poorly correlated
+8.63%
BCAUF - BCCMY
2%
Poorly correlated
-10.00%
AYRO - BCCMY
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
More