Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCAMX vs RWMFX
BCAMX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts BCAMX vs RWMFX
Boston Common ESG Impact US Equity
Price$75.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.23M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.23
Change+$0.16 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
BCAMX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCAMX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAMX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. BCAMX (75.2M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than BCAMX: RWMFX (1.43) vs BCAMX (0.34). BCAMX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: BCAMX (13 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). BCAMX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. BCAMX (17.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCAMX: RWMFX (250) vs BCAMX (10000). BCAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.60 vs. RWMFX (7.95). BCAMX return over 5 years is better than : 58.81 vs. RWMFX (50.81).
| BCAMX | RWMFX | BCAMX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.31 | 326% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.31 | 381% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.219 | 8.213 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.2M | 205B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 1.43 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.60 | 7.95 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.83 | 34.82 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.81 | 50.81 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.17 | 83.34 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement