Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCAMX vs FXAIX
BCAMX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts BCAMX vs FXAIX
Boston Common ESG Impact US Equity
Price$80.10
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.44M
BCAMX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCAMX vs. FXAIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAMX is a Buy and FXAIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 739B vs. BCAMX (76.4M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than BCAMX: FXAIX (1.11) vs BCAMX (0.32). BCAMX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: BCAMX (14 years) vs FXAIX (15 years). BCAMX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). BCAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCAMX: FXAIX (0) vs BCAMX (10000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.07 vs. BCAMX (6.20). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 99.82 vs. BCAMX (54.21).
| BCAMX | FXAIX | BCAMX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.01 | 6,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.01 | 7,867% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.943 | 17.153 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.4M | 739B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.11 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.20 | 14.07 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.44 | 74.61 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.21 | 99.82 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.59 | 258.16 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement